Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bkopto

If the article is to be believed, ANY jury pool would have had to acquit because the prosecutors offered no evidence except attendance at the protest march.


15 posted on 06/04/2018 12:22:39 PM PDT by DannyTN (Daniel Ollis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: DannyTN; IC Ken

Take a deep breath before reading the below article, which leaves only the question, why did they do that?:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/trump-inauguration-charges-dismissed-because-prosecutors-withheld-evidence/ar-AAy4vXy?ocid=spartandhp

D.C. Superior Court Chief Judge Robert Morin found that prosecutors with the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia, which is part of the Justice Department, had committed Brady violations by withholding undercover videos that James O’Keefe’s Project Veritas had turned over to the government.


29 posted on 06/06/2018 1:21:12 AM PDT by blueplum ( "...this moment is your moment: it belongs to you... " President Donald J. Trump, Jan 20, 2017)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson