Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hercuroc

The word “Narrow” was used in the sense that the opinion covered a very narrow facet of the case. The ruling ignored the major issue of religious freedom to refuse to work for homosexuals.


168 posted on 06/04/2018 8:46:53 AM PDT by FXRP (Just me and the pygmy pony)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: FXRP

“The ruling ignored the major issue of religious freedom to refuse to work for homosexuals.”

The SCOTUS is like an untrained person “picking at someone’s wound” but not really doing anything to stop the bleeding. The rules need to be changed so that the SCOTUS is GIVEN a list of stuff to consider and issue rulings on. They should not be able to duck their responsibility to provide the legal foundations sought in a timely fashion. I mean just how many decades do we have to wait for a definitive ruling on the Second Amendment?


172 posted on 06/04/2018 8:53:05 AM PDT by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson