To: Does so
There are two medical studies links in Post #3
There will be lots of effort to label it false i think.
38 posted on
06/01/2018 3:30:34 AM PDT by
free_life
(If you ask Jesus to forgive you and to save you, He will.)
To: free_life
There are two medical studies links in Post #3
Both articles refer to fetal Microchimerism. Its real from a fetus, including babies who were killed in the womb. Fetal cells can sustain themselves in a host body, that’s what they are designed to do. God is a hell of an engineer.
No studies have proved sperm as a source of Microchimerism. It is unlikely, since sperm cells don’t have a long lifetime in the male body. We are constantly destroying and replenishing our sperm cells in a male body. It’s unlikely the female body would sustain living tissue. No study has indicated sperm surviving a few days after sex, and the myth predates genetic testing that made the detection of fetal Microchimerism possible.
40 posted on
06/01/2018 3:50:39 AM PDT by
Dominick
("Freedom consists not in doing what we like, but in having the right to do what we ought." - JP II)
To: free_life
Why/How could one make this UP?
41 posted on
06/01/2018 3:53:36 AM PDT by
Big Red Badger
(UNSCANABLE in an IDIOCRACY!)
To: free_life
I hope so. All scientific studies should be rigorously attacked, scrutinized, and their results recorded, compared, and correlated.
If these results are repeatable; if others can isolate tissue with these variant DNA strands, then it is a massive discovery.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson