The supreme court once held that pornography (obscenity) could be interpreted differently in Salt Lake City than it might be in New York City. Community standards were applicable over a national standard. However the court allowed that in one's own home one had a right to view or read material which might satisfy your personal interests and not be in violation of the community standards. (Child pornography excluded.)
Why is homosexual conduct not considered within the constraints of this interpretation? Mr Ermold should run to San Francisco if he seeks to be county clerk.