Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PAR35
In addition, there's that "Measure twice, cut, well, move once" thing.

From what I've read, the clearances were such that the placement of the moving vehicles under the bridge had to be changed to accommodate obstructions, thereby altering the stresses on the bridge, leading to the cracking of the concrete, and the "warping" of the internal pipe compression mechanism to the point of uselessness, which meant "FAILURE".

11 posted on 05/25/2018 3:40:27 PM PDT by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Calvin Locke

A freeper, perhaps you, posted photos of that. The side that held up had a vehicle support say 15’ from the cantelevered end overhang. The failed side it was say 25’ from the end - and as you say - to avoid the extra shoring, etc. That seems like a good place to start.

Also - seeing as it was a cable bridge, but no cables in place yet - would seem another likely critical factor.


12 posted on 05/25/2018 3:48:09 PM PDT by 21twelve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson