Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Simon Green

“A confusingly written Florida statute stands in the way,” the attorneys wrote. “If the defendants claim that [the law] entitles them to immunity from such claims, and the courts agree,” the victims will be forced to pay the gun maker’s and seller’s legal fees instead of recovering damages.


There’s nothing confusing about this law. And I hope the plaintiffs are bankrupted by those legal fees.


3 posted on 05/24/2018 9:31:04 AM PDT by Zhang Fei (Journalism is about covering important stories. With a pillow, until they stop moving.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Zhang Fei

Loser-pays should be the standard for civil suits, IMO.


7 posted on 05/24/2018 9:33:47 AM PDT by rarestia (Repeal the 17th Amendment and ratify Article the First to give the power back to the people!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Zhang Fei

Unless the guns were defective, this is stupid


16 posted on 05/24/2018 9:38:23 AM PDT by robroys woman (So you're not confused, I'm using my wife's account.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson