Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bob434

Swalwell stated that those that did not turn in their guns would be prosecuted if they were caught with an illegal gun.

So, we would have ex wives, unfriendly neighbors inform the police of gun owners, and DAs in selected leftist districts would begin beta testing prosecution.

This would not go over well. Ultimately, all State actions are backed up by a gun.

I wish Tucker would have put a finer point on this discussion and discussed this possible scenario. Tucker seemed to react emotionally. This Swalwell simply parrots points and does not respond directly to questions.


61 posted on 05/22/2018 5:50:06 AM PDT by grumpygresh (Abolish administrative law. It's regressive, medieval and unconstitutional!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: grumpygresh

[[I wish Tucker would have put a finer point on this discussion and discussed this possible scenario. Tucker seemed to react emotionally.]]

Yup exactly- my thoughts as well- Yes he talks fast- but doesn’t say much in defense of our second amendment/inalienable rights- and o nthe issue of climate change-
He could be making excellent points to refute it but doesn’t because he hasn’t researched the issue well enough- He allows guests to give their false narratives but he has no real effective comeback many times- because he isn’t up on the facts- As a representative of the right- engaging people on the left- he has a duty to counter the lies with truth and facts- not emotional responses-


63 posted on 05/22/2018 9:03:39 AM PDT by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson