I guess it is over the top for a woman to harass an man in a ladys room.
To be totally lucid and logical; why is alright for a man that thinks he should be a woman to use the Ladys room but it is NOT alright for a man that thinks he is a man to use the Ladys room?
To my thinking there is no difference. Either it is alright for a man to use the Ladys room or it isnt. What is in a mans head is totally immaterial because no one can know.
Video recording is for her protection, in case the mentally ill man says she literally threatened him versus the standard “you invalidated my existence, that’s literally figuratively like murdering me”.
In this she said / nut said dispute, without the video evidence, the nut could press hate crimes charges against her in California. Remember, there are places you get fined for not using their preferred pronouns. Major fines and jail time because the nut says you threatened to hurt them ... would be an opportunity you know the DNC would take against a conservative woman.
So yes, I agree with her filming it for her protection.
My prior employer actually caved to both. Whatever the transgender did was right, because the poor things are so oppressed, no matter how tacky or a violation of privacy.