Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Albion Wilde
It has been put to rest long, long ago

Based on her story that she didn't start with him until after Harry was born? The testimony of the adulteress is not exactly probative on the issue.

Or are you suggesting that we should be looking at one of the other lovers. He wasn't exactly the first, was he?

101 posted on 05/20/2018 5:57:49 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]


To: PAR35

I am suggesting that from the time of Harry’s birth until four years ago, i.e. almost 30 years, Harry was third in line to the throne, based on bloodlines. Do you seriously think for one minute that if there was any possiblility that he is not Charles’ biological son, the royal family wouldn’t have bothered to get a DNA test? Be real.


107 posted on 05/20/2018 6:38:21 PM PDT by Albion Wilde (We're even doing the right thing for them. They just don't know it yet. --Donald Trump, CPAC '18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson