Posted on 05/20/2018 4:12:47 AM PDT by Alas Babylon!
I agree. The conservative pundits like to draw the distinction between the few bad apples at the top and the rank and file. The fact is that many of the rank and file were carrying out the orders of this corrupt leadership and never blew the whistle on them. None of this would have come to light if Trump had not been elected.
Comey is huddling with his lawyers going over the draft IG report and hopefully, making preparations for a grand jury appearance in the very near future.
He better have excellent lawyers.
Not sure if he is smart enough to realize that he is in deep doo-doo.
Does he lie under oath as a normal everyday thing and then try to cover while talking to Brett Baer on FNC?
Not smart or wise.
Yes! Thanks. It is certainly NOT forbidden.
FORTRAN = Code for real old geezers.
;-)
Thanks Rod. There are so many “citizen researchers” that I am amazed by how many are putting the pieces of the puzzle together.
Over on Freeper’s Q Anon: (5/19/18) FRiendly Freeper Collaboration, Bagster does a comprehensive review of the Q drops. You may have to sift through 1600 responses, the trolls, complainers, those with hurt feelings etc, so reading the thread can be time consuming. I have asked him/her if they would like to share their reviews here.
Over on twitter and at his site prayingmedic.com, this Patriot does a very thorough review of the drops and he makes it very easy to understand. Again reading his threads and listening to his videos takes time.
Q has generated a lot of controversy with believers and skeptics on both sides of the fence. I think Gen Flynn and perhaps Adm. Rogers( just a hunch on my part) have something to do with Q and that is why I take the time to read the drops.
Do you remember back before the actual election Trump won and what he said about accepting the results of a fair election?
And how he was skewered over it?
Seems those doing the skewering were setting up to impede, repel and contest the election, not Donald Trump.
I also remembering some of them (especially in the press) saying that if Trump won, that despite the will of the people, they had a DUTY to oppose him. Seems like some government employees had the same thought.
If in doing so they violated the law there is plenty of space at Fort Leavenworth for them.
Am I the only person who thinks of the Aardvark from the old Pink Panther Cartoon Show when I listen to him?
I don't know which would have been worse, 4 years of "the Aardvark" or 4 years of "Shrillary". If the GOPe had managed to foist Jeb! or one of their candidates on us in the 2016 General Election...
BkMk
I wonder if the bagster would be up for that,there are a bunch over there that could probabl summarie for us.
Hey bud would you be interested in doing a “Q” summary of what you guys have done during the week on this thread on sundays? Your stuff over there is vital and so well done we sure would love to have it over here.
YOu are welcome.
YOu guys/gals do a stellar job over there with 2,000 post threads over and over that alone says it all.any input over here would surely be welcome.
I am sure that McCabe, Comey Hillary, et. al., take him as seriously as a heart attack.
Why should they? You don’t have a shred of evidence the “Trump” DOJ has any intention of prosecuting anybody. Wishful thinking only goes so far.
Verified account @realDonaldTrump
I hereby demand, and will do so officially tomorrow, that the Department of Justice look into whether or not the FBI/DOJ infiltrated or surveilled the Trump Campaign for Political Purposes - and if any such demands or requests were made by people within the Obama Administration!
also an agent provocateur (which he’s done before)
I think Trump very astutely talked about voter fraud enough so that it didn’t happen as it could have if he didn’t.
Wouldn’t take much to flip some of those key swing states Trump needed to shut Hillary out. That’s why I believe she didn’t campaign in them. They had plans, then couldn’t execute.
Hillary truly did run a popular vote campaign by campaigning in heavily populated areas.
The Sunday political talk shows
for 5/20/18
Below the FreeRepublic Sunday talk show thread link.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3656633/posts?page=1
The major talking points of the day
It’s still all about the Russians but this week they want to take away our guns for our shooting of those kids in Santa Fe.
Highlight of Fox News Sunday:
Oh my, Mark Kelly shows up and tells us about the shooting of children is all the faults of the NRA.
Oliver North has a plan and it involves recruiting millions more into the NRA.
Link to Fox News Sunday Below:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q57NxfyEhCE
Highlight of Meet the Press:
Adam Schiff asserts this nonsense about an FBI mole in the Trump campaign is nonsense.
Roger Stone fights back although he comes off a bit odd.
Link to Meet the Press show below:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rnD6vCGkH5M
Highlight of Face the Nation
Larry Kudlow seems to be a bit inebriated. Just my opinion.
Below the link to Face the Nation:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p1hmCDFgQsY
THIS WEEK (ABC): Texas Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick; Fred Guttenberg, father of Parkland, Florida, shooting victim; Nicole Hockley, mother of Newtown, Connecticut, shooting victim; Kudlow.
Highlight of This Week with George Stephanopolous
Bereaved parents of shooting victims advocates more gun confiscation from law-abiding citizens.
Link to This Week below:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YVHV-8M67hg
Highlight of State of the Union
This Warner guy, Dem from Virginia, is awful and lies whenever his mouth is moving.
Link to This Week below:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b9nC9yx0QrM
Today’s’ programmers don’t know jack about Fortran and Cobol. Cobol is a gold mine for old geezers consultants.
Every hing I know about Inspector Generals I learned from Danny Kay.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.