They were to show that men are more likely to react violently to being rejected because men are more violent in general. Which you agreed with.
So, you argue generally about male/female domestic violence when it suits you, and then confine it to rejected men when it doesnt.
I was talking to a person who was bringing up domestic violence to me in order to make a case that women can also be violent when angry. This may be true, but it was not my point. My point is and always has been that men being violent when rejected is not the result of feminism. It's how men have always been. Which you agreed with.
Both men and women can act badly when rejected, the point made in post 42, which you took issue with, confining that behavior to violence specifically.
That sentence is incomprehensible. Post 42 is MY POST. Can you restate?
Lol, and you even used an absurd trope about scorned women being a figment of male literature. Wow.
He was using a quote from male literature as some sort of proof. I pointed out it was a quote from male literature.
No matter what you say, the facts remain that a rejected man is more likely to murder than a rejected woman. This is not the result of feminism. This is simply how men are.
If that’s your only point, then you are likely correct. Women act out their anger and hurt in various other ways, generally. Boys learn pretty quickly not to provoke someone who is likely to kick their ass. Girls don’t, I guess.