What kind of lawyer uses twitter to argue over name calling? What a dip $hit. Smh
The kind of lawyer that can bill his client $2000 to post that short tweet.
The kind that knows he can't exonerate his client in court.
“What kind of lawyer uses twitter to argue over name calling? What a dip $hit. Smh”
He’s your typical Secular Progressive Capo Lawya. No hair on his head, but a full, closely-trimmed beard and wire rimmed glasses. He could be a “twin” of our current crap weasel, anti-gun CA State Senator Steve Glazer. These are men who should never be photographed eating a banana! And yes, dip$hit is the proper terminology to be used in this instance.