Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Zinke moves to protect critical minerals from foreign threats.....
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/energy/ryan-zinke-moves-to-protect-critical-minerals-from-foreign-threats ^ | 5/17/2018 | John Siciliano

Posted on 05/17/2018 8:43:09 PM PDT by caww

Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke is listing 35 minerals used in aircraft, cellphones, and other important technologies as "vital" to national security in a move to wean the U.S. off foreign suppliers.

The list includes such valuable metals as aluminum and titanium, as well as uranium, helium, lithium, platinum, potash, and strontium. The materials are used in aircraft and other aerospace technologies. Lithium is used in batteries to power a wide range of products from cellphones to electric cars.

A final rule to be published Friday says the U.S. is "heavily reliant" on imports of the minerals. "This dependency of the United States on foreign sources creates a strategic vulnerability for both its economy and military to adverse foreign government action, natural disaster, and other events that can disrupt

President Trump directed Zinke to conduct a review of the nation's critical mineral assets and to create a strategy on how to handle vulnerabilities.

The final list begins phase two of Trump's executive order, with the Commerce Department developing a federal strategy to ensure supplies of the minerals remain reliable.

In February, Zinke listed the 35 minerals as critical to the nation's economy and national security as it took comments on the draft proposal. The list was

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: deptofinterior; minerals; mining; ryanzinke
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

1 posted on 05/17/2018 8:43:09 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: caww

Potash??


2 posted on 05/17/2018 8:47:46 PM PDT by SteveH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: caww

I have to admit, Mr. Zinke has been a pleasant surprise. He’s turned out to be a pretty good Secretary of Interior.


3 posted on 05/17/2018 8:50:00 PM PDT by Mr. N. Wolfe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: caww
Seems one of our brainiacs in the Federal government could have figured this out, say about 1960.
 
4 posted on 05/17/2018 8:52:05 PM PDT by Governor Dinwiddie (MAGA in the mornin', MAGA in the evenin', MAGA at suppertime . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Governor Dinwiddie

Nah...too much money to be made.


5 posted on 05/17/2018 8:54:03 PM PDT by AZSonic (Just Make America Great.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: caww

This has long been an issue with the Feds, especially the DoD.

Many reports over the years on what to do about Strategic materials.


6 posted on 05/17/2018 8:56:36 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SteveH

We get most of our potash (potassium carbonate) from Canada currently.


7 posted on 05/17/2018 8:57:31 PM PDT by factoryrat (We are the producers, the creators. Grow it, mine it, build it. MAGA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: caww

I think the idea would be to import as much of these elements as possible from outside sources.

This has two effects. One, we draw down the foreign suppliers, and two, this puts these elements into the domestic scrap/recycling stream.

Primary extraction and refining of these elements is a very expensive and energy intensive process. So, let the chicoms burn out all their resources.

The post consumer scrap stream recycling of these elements is a much energy intensive process. Make the chicoms greed do the heavy lifting.


8 posted on 05/17/2018 9:07:57 PM PDT by factoryrat (We are the producers, the creators. Grow it, mine it, build it. MAGA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: factoryrat

If we become a Banana Republic, wouldn’t we be cornering the market on Potassium?


9 posted on 05/17/2018 9:10:01 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: factoryrat

missing a “less”¿


10 posted on 05/17/2018 9:11:43 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: factoryrat

I don’t know enough about it to comment. So it’s great to hear from someone who does. Thanks for posting.

I think it’s amazing the things which our President is addressing....as important that his appointments have adjusted to their dept operations, made changes and are ready to work forward with what is best for this country. This article appeared to me to be just that....action.


11 posted on 05/17/2018 9:15:38 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2
From what I understand the lists are flexible..so it appears they'll be closely looking at these....
12 posted on 05/17/2018 9:17:23 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

If you know any particulars please share. I for one know nothing about these but if our guys are addressing it there’s reasons they’re doing so.


13 posted on 05/17/2018 9:19:07 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: caww

Like everything else, this has become politicised.

And crony kapitalized.

It’s still a viable non-partisan issue that should be addressed to MAGA going forward.


14 posted on 05/17/2018 9:24:57 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

Good idea to keep on eye on how it goes then. The Globalists most definatly would want control of resources as nations do seem to be on a ‘resources run’ to see who gets what.


15 posted on 05/17/2018 9:29:11 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: caww
The list includes such valuable metals as aluminum and titanium, as well as uranium, helium, lithium, platinum, potash, and strontium.

Uranium...where have I heard that word before??

16 posted on 05/17/2018 9:33:41 PM PDT by Cowboy Bob ("Other People's Money" = The life blood of Liberalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: caww

Hey, how did we actually get smart people into these government positions?!

Ohhhh... “President Trump directed Zinke to conduct a review of the nation’s critical mineral assets and to create a strategy on how to handle vulnerabilities.”

— more winning —


17 posted on 05/17/2018 9:35:14 PM PDT by deks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: factoryrat
I think the idea would be to import as much of these elements as possible from outside sources.

Then you'll be disppaointed to learn the point of the policy is to achieve the opposite.

You see, by buying cheap, imported supplies we're slowing consumption of domestic supplies, which they want you to believe is bad.

Their plan is to raise the price of American manufactured goods that contain these supplies by reducing their sources, which will have the added bonus of reducing our domestic supply sources of these elements faster. This is somehow in our 'strategic interest'.

That's what you get when you trust 'the Commerce Department developing a federal strategy to ensure supplies of the minerals remain reliable'.

18 posted on 05/17/2018 9:39:34 PM PDT by Gunslingr3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: caww

I think the interest is a lessions learned from WWII.

Chromium to use in alloying steel was not availshle domestically in sufficient quantity.

Germany had problems obtaining Gasoline and Diesel. They went to converting coal to same.

These days not only the Military is at risk, but the general economy.

It is a matter of National Security.

Ethanol from corn and real sugar not withstanding.


19 posted on 05/17/2018 9:45:25 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: deks
Hey, how did we actually get smart people into these government positions?!

Ohhhh... “President Trump directed Zinke to conduct a review of the nation’s critical mineral assets and to create a strategy on how to handle vulnerabilities.”

— more winning —

Yeah, because central economic planning works if you get a Republican in charge... Communism didn't fail because people are dumb, it failed because bureaucracy is dumb.

The only thing we're going to get more of with bureaucrats fiddling with our economic supply chains is inefficiency - and the real consequence of that is less wealth produced. This daft notion that giving bureaucracy economic controls are going to make us better off never falls completely out of fashion, but I'm surprised to see if met favorably in these parts.

20 posted on 05/17/2018 9:46:37 PM PDT by Gunslingr3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson