*snort*
DWS is ‘just shy’ of a full deck.
Wasserman Schultz’s refusal to answer questions could “merit a request for her resignation”. Taxpayers say that’s not nearly enough for all the damage D/W/S has done.
CONGRESS, PRESIDENT TRUMP, AG SESSIONS AND THE FBI NEED TO DETERMINE:
<><> D/W/S was then in power——heading the DNC...riding in AF One with Obama. We demand to know the extent of DNC assistance to (A) the three House members of the House intelligence panel, and, (B) the five House members of the House Committee on Foreign Affairs who were among the dozens of elected members the suspects IT’ed for on a shared basis.
<><>Were govt intel computers ever transported off-premises?
<><>Did the FBI and/or Secret Service accompany and supervise the transport of the server?
<><> Did the three brothers have an active email account?
<><> Was there continuity of intel computer activity or did the intel computers ever go off-line?
<><> Who received govt intel?
<><>Did the three brothers get officially qualified by the DNC to handle national-security-level data?
<><> Did the three brothers ever “upgrade, manage, and secure” the DNC server.
<><> What - specifically - did they do?
<><> Did the DNC vet the three brothers security clearance to handle this type of intel?
<><> What were the DNC firewall protocols in place at the time?
<><>Who, by name, had access to intel computers, and the administrative authorization to do so?
<><>When was that authorization given?
<><>Did the three brothers ever remove all data from the intel computers?
<><> Was malware or antivirus also on the server?
<><> Was the inherent firewall, virus protection, or operating system “upgraded, managed, and secured” by the brothers?
<><> Did the DNC report any incidents such as DOS attack, hacking, etc. How were they resolved?
<><> Did the three brothers maintain the DNC intel computer?
<><> Does the DNC know if the House Permanent Intelligence Committee computers in functioning condition at this time?
<><> Does the DNC have the work schedule of the brothers just prior to being outed for security breaches?
<><> Were normal and regular backup procedures executed on the server?
<><> Where are the back-ups kept?
<><> If no backups were taken, does the DNC have a disaster recovery location? Where is that?
<><> Did the DNC have a backup plan if the House Permanent Intelligence Committee plan intel equipment failed or was found to have been compromised?
<><> Does the DNC list other foreign nationals (from countries President Obama identified as terrorist countries) employed on Capitol Hill?
<><> The DNC must list foreign nationals by name and country who currently have access to US intel and are using govt computers.
Call President Trump: Comments: 202-456-1111 Switchboard: 202-456-1414
FBI TIP PAGE-—https://tips.fbi.gov
CONTACT CONGRESS: Capitol Switchboard 1-866-220-0044
THE STANDOUT FACTS:
<><> The Awan clan had access to sensitive US intel from House Democrats’ Intelligence and Foreign Affairs committees..
<><> The clan did not work for companies currently vetted to do such work.
<><> They DID NOT HAVE.....and could not possibly have qualified for.....security clearances.
<><> Luke Rosiak of the Daily Caller reported that Imran “was doing IT work on Democrats computers while living in Pakistan three-or-more months at a time annually.”
NOTE Half of the Republican Congress has officially signed on to the US labeling Pakistan a terrorist country.
“DWS is ‘just shy’ of a full deck.”
Yeh, haven’t heard much about her IT paramour lately....
Debbie Wasserman Schultz is the very definition of one who uses the introduction of great fear and loathing in the targeted demographic as a tactic to intimidate and suppress their actions to make a free and informed choice. If that is not being a terrorist, relying on the real or implied threats to the targeted demographic, then the very definition has been corrupted and devaluted so as to have no real impact. Bullying is a form of terrorism, no matter who employs the tactic.
This is similar to simply labeling someone a “racists” or “sexist” when the demonstrated actions have always included the very refusal to accept and embrace these vicious traits. Ir is an insult and meant that way.
Hurling the name of an undesirable activity against an announced agenda does not make the actions of the recipient of those insults undesirable or anathema.
Mark Hamill should call out Mrs. Schultz as a traitor instead of libeling President Trump. She is after all a cheat, a liar and incompetent “representative “.
Waiting ..........