To: SoConPubbie
No, you are passing off your wild conjecture as fact, as apparently you cannot prove your assertion. I can get some crayons and draw you a picture, if you really need it. The fact is, they kept the "shush fund" quiet. They continue to protect an entirely Unconstitutional witch hunt headed by DOJ to continue. They sat back for 8 years and legitimized an illegitimate president. They still refuse to support Trump and fight with him. Instead, they continue to fight against him. How much evidence do you really need?
66 posted on
05/15/2018 6:49:13 AM PDT by
dware
(Americans prefer peaceful slavery over dangerous freedom)
To: dware
I can get some crayons and draw you a picture, if you really need it. The fact is, they kept the "shush fund" quiet. They continue to protect an entirely Unconstitutional witch hunt headed by DOJ to continue. They sat back for 8 years and legitimized an illegitimate president. They still refuse to support Trump and fight with him. Instead, they continue to fight against him. How much evidence do you really need?
You had named names declaring the parties (senators) you had named as being guilty. You stated it as if it was fact, when in fact, you have NO FACTS to prove your point, just a general assertion.
If you are going to argue a point, do it from a point of evidence so your argument/opinion can be respected.
70 posted on
05/15/2018 10:34:52 AM PDT by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson