Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: laplata
That kid would be way down the line or even taken off the list.

Unless he pulled a Richard III.

13 posted on 05/14/2018 11:08:24 AM PDT by Mr Ramsbotham (Laws against sodomy are honored in the breech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Mr Ramsbotham

Unless he pulled a Richard III.

><

Lol Hardly likely.

Besides, the Muzzies will have control over the former Great Britain by the time that child is grown up. He’ll probably live in Canada.


16 posted on 05/14/2018 11:10:44 AM PDT by laplata (Liberals/Progressives have diseased minds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Mr Ramsbotham; miss marmelstein
Please stop maligning Richard III; he had NOTHING at all to do with killing the little princes in the tower, nor any of his brothers! That crap was Shakespeare's PROPAGANDA, to make the Tudors feel good about themselves and isn't factual at all!

And Little mis greedy/phony Markle would have to kill off her about to be father-in-law, brother & sister-in-law, and the THREE kids, as well as any future progeny that Wills & Kate might have. NOT GONNA HAPPEN !

29 posted on 05/14/2018 11:52:47 AM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson