Skip to comments.
Don’t Try to Blackmail Us on Nafta, Mr. President
Wall Street Journal ^
| May 10, 2018
| Pat Toomey
Posted on 05/11/2018 5:23:40 AM PDT by reaganaut1
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
I support Toomey.
To: reaganaut1
“He will need the support of pro-trade Republicans like me..”
Shut up and go away, nobody needs you.
2
posted on
05/11/2018 5:27:40 AM PDT
by
JPJones
(More tariffs, less income tax.)
To: reaganaut1
3
posted on
05/11/2018 5:29:27 AM PDT
by
TTFlyer
To: reaganaut1
I’m going to support Toomey over whatever dope the Dems put up, but this is so tone-deaf for a Pennsylvania politician in an election year. And Toomey always seems to be picking the wrong battles. He is conservative on a lot of things but the only time you see him in the news is when he’s on his high horse about some liberal issue that he supports or where he’s going against Trump.
4
posted on
05/11/2018 5:29:43 AM PDT
by
Opinionated Blowhard
(When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.)
To: reaganaut1
NAFTA DESERVES to be diminished, from its present sweeping terms that work to the overall disadvantage of the interests of the United States. Keep in mind that neither Canada nor Mexico is a part of the United States, but separate and sovereign countries, and especially FOREIGN. Different laws, different basis to their legal codes, and sometimes subtle but highly divisive interpretations of civil conduct.
Mixing oil and water is a tricky proposition.
5
posted on
05/11/2018 5:30:20 AM PDT
by
alloysteel
(Life is uncertain. Eat dessert first.)
To: reaganaut1
[I think we should stop putting up links that cause us to pay to read them. This good intention becomes click bait for advertising the site. Wall Street Journal should be the first to go.]
6
posted on
05/11/2018 5:30:42 AM PDT
by
ThePatriotsFlag
(We are getting even more than we voted for.)
To: reaganaut1
7
posted on
05/11/2018 5:33:04 AM PDT
by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn)
To: reaganaut1
Tariffs are Patriot candy.
8
posted on
05/11/2018 5:33:50 AM PDT
by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn)
To: reaganaut1
Suddenly they want to use constitutional treaty rules. Where were these idiots when the Iran treaty was violating the constitution?
9
posted on
05/11/2018 5:34:36 AM PDT
by
xzins
(Retired US Army chaplain. Support our troops by praying for their victory.)
To: reaganaut1
I am not so greedy as to destroy the USA industrial base, cause social havoc, lower GDP growth, in order to buy a cheaper poor quality Mexican made consumer goods. IT'S NOT WORTH IT AT ANY PRICE.
10
posted on
05/11/2018 5:35:17 AM PDT
by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn)
To: reaganaut1
Toomey has his orders
He is trying to protect a frightened Pennsylvania company making products in Mexico
11
posted on
05/11/2018 5:37:49 AM PDT
by
Thibodeaux
(Long Live the Republic!)
To: reaganaut1
Despite the best efforts, ridiculous fear tactics and gas lighting of the Bush league globalist cabal, the USA is changing back to it's protectionist roots - and not moment to soon.
Ha ha. You lose. Where are you globalist Free Traders going to go?
12
posted on
05/11/2018 5:40:09 AM PDT
by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn)
To: reaganaut1
I remember when Toomey was “our guy”.
13
posted on
05/11/2018 5:40:30 AM PDT
by
cmj328
(We live here.)
To: reaganaut1
To: reaganaut1
The Iran deal was never voted on by Congress. No problem for Trump to unilaterally kill it. NAFTA (no matter what you think of it) WAS. Congress needs to vote on the changes, and it will. Unlike Obama, Trump proceeds in a constitutional manner.
15
posted on
05/11/2018 5:41:43 AM PDT
by
jdsteel
(Americans are Dreamers too!!!)
To: aMorePerfectUnion
Mr. “Universal Background Checks” speaks.
I give you the GOPe.
16
posted on
05/11/2018 5:46:57 AM PDT
by
headstamp 2
(My "White Privilege" is my work ethic.)
To: JPJones
The minute the Democrats figure out a way to nominate a candidate who is not insane, this guy is toast.
To: Opinionated Blowhard
Im sure he will change his toom when Trump does a mega rally in his district.
To: reaganaut1
Pennsylvania Senator Pat Toomey has a 60% score from the Conservative Review. Not good.
19
posted on
05/11/2018 6:24:45 AM PDT
by
jonrick46
(Trump continues to have all the right enemies.)
To: jonrick46
Congressman Lou Barletta, who is running against Bob Casey for the other U.S. Senate seat in PA, is the polar opposite of Pat Toomey on immigration and trade. For this reason, he has a lot of fans (including me) here on FR.
Barletta's Conservative Review score is 43%.
20
posted on
05/11/2018 6:37:30 AM PDT
by
Alberta's Child
("I saw a werewolf drinking a pina colada at Trader Vic's.")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson