Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Eleutheria5

The Balfour Declaration was a “unilateral move’ by the British cabinet in the face of the crumbling Ottoman Empire. I suspect that deep down if not openly this is castigated as imperialist by the left wing.


9 posted on 05/10/2018 8:02:43 AM PDT by Lent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Lent

Of course it was imperialist. That was a time of imperialism, and the British Empire was rewarding its Jewish allies, Chaim Weitzman, The Jewish Brigades, etc., by awarding them a homeland under British protection, for their substantial help in taking apart the Ottoman Empire. Unfortunately, a clique of pan-Arabists within the military and the British Foreign Office began undermining the Balfour Declaration almost the moment that the League of Nations ratified it.

I could argue that Russia’s presence in Syria is imperialist, too, and it is. But somehow it’s only immoral when Britain or America does it. China can do no wrong, and Russia can only do wrong after they renounce Communism, and even then only sometimes.


11 posted on 05/10/2018 11:32:19 AM PDT by Eleutheria5 (“If you are not prepared to use force to defend civilization, then be prepared to accept barbarism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson