Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dontreadthis

Outstanding!!!

One crucial item for your timeline.

Recall in the final weeks of the Obama administration the sudden gutting of barriers to interagency intel sharing. I remember at the time knowing there was something deeply diabolical about this. It’s now obvious it was done to allow free passage of “intel” gleaned from the illegal surveillance of their political adversary between 16 or 17 different agencies.

Now, when the inevitable geyser of leaks erupted, instead of a handful or fewer readily-identifiable potential leakers, they were legion and spread across numerous agencies. Leakers throughout the government who could anonymously corroborate each other and add credence to the whole Russian collusion narrative.

How many leaks with attribution to unnamed government “sources” did we hear and read about during those tumultuous, infuriating months? More specifically, how many leaks divulged information about, or gained from, the FISC-authorized “counterintelligence” investigation?

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/12/us/politics/nsa-gets-more-latitude-to-share-intercepted-communications.html


59 posted on 05/10/2018 8:41:46 AM PDT by fire and forget (Sic Semper Tyrannis Liberalis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: fire and forget; bitt; LS; Liz; dontreadthis; monkeyshine; bigbob; iontheball; Sacajaweau; ...
"One crucial item for your timeline.

Recall in the final weeks of the Obama administration the sudden gutting of barriers to interagency intel sharing. I remember at the time knowing there was something deeply diabolical about this. It’s now obvious it was done to allow free passage of “intel” gleaned from the illegal surveillance of their political adversary between 16 or 17 different agencies.

Now, when the inevitable geyser of leaks erupted, instead of a handful or fewer readily-identifiable potential leakers, they were legion and spread across numerous agencies. Leakers throughout the government who could anonymously corroborate each other and add credence to the whole Russian collusion narrative.

How many leaks with attribution to unnamed government “sources” did we hear and read about during those tumultuous, infuriating months? More specifically, how many leaks divulged information about, or gained from, the FISC-authorized “counterintelligence” investigation?

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/12/us/politics/nsa-gets-more-latitude-to-share-intercepted-communications.html

____________

Great post ...... bears repeating to all.

69 posted on 05/11/2018 3:13:02 AM PDT by a little elbow grease (Zip ties and duct tape are far more productive than pussy hats and #metoo tweets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson