Criminal coverup by the silent coup.
Citing ‘national security’ as reason for not naming the source of info being used to remove an elected president is highly queer er... Irregular
The whole nature of the case itself is ‘national security’ isn’t it? Yet Hitlery Rotten Clinton leaked priviledged State Dept information to her own civilian daughter about the Benghazi terrorist attack on 9-11-2012 while she persisted in lying to Congress and the media for weeks afterwards blaming it on a youtube video. Hillary even lied to the mouring families.
I wonder how this “secret source” will hold up given what the constitution has to say about prosecution for treason:
“No person shall be convicted of treason unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on confession in open court.” I don’t think secret sources play well in open court.