“Oh, I get it now.
My argument is dishonest but I am not dishonest.
Is that different from Hillary Clinton spewing her dishonest spittle onto the American public but she herself is not dishonest? “
Yeah, get it and stop being willingly obtuse.
You made ONE dishonest argument, and I attack the argument, I could not possibly attack you because I don’t know you.
Attacking an argument is not attacking the person, how is it so hard to see the difference ?
So comparing to Hillary is a totally bogus equivalency. Hillary is a dishonest person because she constantly has dishonest arguments, things, decisions, deals, associates... not because she make ONE dishonest argument.
My argument is that I don't agree with you.
How is THAT dishonest?
Your argument is full of crap.
But, of course, I would never imply that YOU'RE FULL OF CRAP.