Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

[N. Korea] Interview: ‘Kim Jong Un is Thinking About How to Keep His Nuclear Assets’
RFA ^ | 2018-05-04 | Yong Jae Mok

Posted on 05/07/2018 5:54:20 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster

Interview: ‘Kim Jong Un is Thinking About How to Keep His Nuclear Assets’

2018-05-04

Thae Yong-ho, North Korea’s former deputy ambassador to the United Kingdom, defected with his family to South Korea in 2016. Following last week’s historic summit between North Korean leader Kim Jong Un and South Korean President Moon Jae-in, Thae told RFA’s Korean Service that he believes the North will never agree to end its weapons program through a “complete, verifiable and irreversible denuclearization” (CVID) process. Instead, he said, Pyongyang will likely seek a way to maintain its current nuclear status, while “denuclearizing the Korean peninsula,” as the two sides agreed, according to its own definition.

RFA: The leaders of the South and North agreed to cooperate for denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula, but Kim Jong Un did not mention anything about denuclearization in his speech after signing the “Panmunjom Declaration.” What is your opinion on this?

Thae Yong-ho: Kim Jong Un considers himself as a “leader of a nuclear state,” and that denuclearization is an issue that needs to be discussed with another nuclear state—the U.S. … Kim Jong Un’s target is the U.S.-North Korea summit [expected in June or July]. Kim would consider a meeting with U.S. President Donald Trump a diplomatic victory.

President Trump’s meeting with the leader of North Korea, a country that the U.S. has described as “evil,” is North Korea’s chance to show the world that it is a “normal nation.” [Kim’s grandfather and father] Kim Il Sung and Kim Jong Il tried very hard to meet with U.S. presidents in the past for a handshake photo, but it didn’t happen. If Kim Jong Un makes it happen, it will be a big propaganda coup for the North.

RFA: North Korea said that they would invite international experts and the press when they remove their nuclear sites. What do you think North Korea’s intention is?

Thae Yong-ho: Kim Jong Un is thinking about how to keep his nuclear assets—this is the biggest issue. Kim likely believes that “with nuclear power in my hands, I can give up on everything else.” For North Korea, nuclear test sites are the “past.” Having ICBM (intercontinental ballistic missile) capability is the North’s “future.” Recently North Korea came to know that it is impossible to reach for their future goal, because of strict international sanctions. Kim Jong Un is now willing to give up the “future” and the “past,” but probably will work to keep what he currently has [nuclear weapons]. Inviting international press and experts when removing nuclear test sites is a part of North Korea’s strategic plan.

RFA: The main agenda of the U.S.-North summit will be North Korea’s denuclearization. The U.S. is requesting a “complete, verifiable and irreversible denuclearization (CVID).”

Thae Yong-ho: The South and North agreed to “denuclearize the Korean peninsula,” but that statement is vague. Additionally, the Panmunjom Declaration states that not just the “North,” but the “South and North” will denuclearize the peninsula … The North has always wanted three things: First, the U.S. to withdraw its nuclear weapons from the Korean peninsula. That happened in 1991. Second, to stop the U.S. from deploying nuclear weapons or strategic assets to the peninsula and the region—the North will make these requests to the U.S. as part of “denuclearization” negotiations. Third, that the U.S. announce it will not use nuclear weapons on the peninsula.

The U.S. wants CVID from North Korea, meaning random access to inspections … But there are no prior examples of CVID in history. It could be seen as an infringement on a nation’s autonomy. I think there is a very low possibility that North Korea accepts the principles of CVID. Besides nuclear and missile facilities, there are many sensitive places that North Korea cannot open to the outside. Political prison camps are one such example … If North Korea accepts, they would eventually have to show the whole world that they have committed crimes against humanity, and would not be able to maintain its current system.

RFA: What do you think will be North Korea’s strategy for the U.S.-North summit?

Thae Yong-ho: The worst outcome for the U.S.-North summit would be a return to the South-North “Joint Declaration of the Denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula” from 1991. At that time, the South and North decided to designate inspection targets for denuclearization through mutual agreement … So there were no proper inspections. If Trump agrees to this type of [inspection], it will have the same outcome as the past agreement.

RFA: President Trump said he would leave the negotiation table if North Korea does not accept CVID. If that happens, what do you think North Korea’s next move would be?

Thae Yong-ho: If that happens, North Korea will say this to the world: “We sincerely tried for nuclear removal and were ready to accept U.S. requirements, but the U.S. insisted on unreasonable conditions.” [CVID] ultimately means that we do not accept North Korean sovereignty, so the North will argue over this and will lobby for international support.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: denuclearization; nkorea; nuke; thaeyongho

1 posted on 05/07/2018 5:54:20 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster; AmericanInTokyo; nuconvert; MizSterious; endthematrix; Grampa Dave; ...

P!


2 posted on 05/07/2018 5:54:44 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster (dead parakeet + lost fishing gear = freep all day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Kim is a sneaky devil, I wouldn’t trust him.


3 posted on 05/07/2018 5:58:06 AM PDT by yldstrk (My heroes have always been cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Kim has to take a lesson from Gaddafi, who made a deal with Bush/Blair but got toppled by Obama/Cameron/frog.


4 posted on 05/07/2018 6:03:43 AM PDT by granada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

There is no need to like or trust Kim. We can make a deal. He disarms, with according to our terms for verification, and he will get to live out the rest of his natural life in the rich manner he covets. Or he doesn’t. The rest is paperwork.


5 posted on 05/07/2018 6:05:58 AM PDT by dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Lil Dong Kim is a vicious little bastard. Treat him like a rattlesnake. Cut the head off and then you have no problem. Although it is unnerving to see the body writh around.


6 posted on 05/07/2018 6:18:42 AM PDT by HighSierra5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Turn it into electrical power??


7 posted on 05/07/2018 6:18:42 AM PDT by Don Corleone (keep the gun. save the cannolis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

He is insincere. He cannot be dealt with in good faith—from his side. No doubt about it. But I guess we have to waste time and momentum and go through the motions until the whole thing implodes as it would be expected to, so we can get back to the business of toppling this fool through economic strangulation which we were on a steady click toward until all this “Pyongyang Olympics Smiling Offensive in Pyongchang, the Kim/Moon Panmunjom nonsense etc. started.


8 posted on 05/07/2018 6:24:54 AM PDT by AmericanInTokyo (Easy does it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Ambassador Thae long ago should have been made a US citizen, security cleared, and brought on as Special Assistant to the President for Korean Affairs and had a seat front row nearly center in these talks sitting next to Bolton and Pompeo and staring down that bastard Kim Jong Un and deliver comments to him in Korean without the English interpreter getting in the way
9 posted on 05/07/2018 6:27:53 AM PDT by AmericanInTokyo (Easy does it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Kim is a narcissist, we run into them all the time. Do we see any of the following in the process?

https://yourlifelifter.com/2015/07/27/how-do-i-manipulate-a-narcissist/


10 posted on 05/07/2018 6:43:36 AM PDT by PeterPrinciple (Thinking Caps are no longer being issued but there must be a warehouse full of them somewhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
What is China's Xi thinking? Is this his play and not actually Kim's?????

I say this because the vocabulary used sounds nothing like anything Kim would use that[s reported in the asian news

11 posted on 05/07/2018 6:49:26 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo

I’m not convinced this is Kim at all.......


12 posted on 05/07/2018 6:51:05 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

I suppose they COULD be so dumb as to screw this up.

They MAY sacrifice full integration with the rest of the world, security, and wealth.

But, why?

The only reason I can think of is to avoid exposure of their criminal enterprise. Their systematic, brutal oppression and untold murders on a grand scale.

They do not want to be held to account for that. And may fear trial at the Hague, or worse, Seoul...the prospective capital of the New Korea.

Can there be an international amnesty? Should there be?


13 posted on 05/07/2018 6:58:57 AM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeterPrinciple
Kim's not the one calling the shots.....he's on a very tight leash. Though we've heard this line before it just doesn't fit how he speaks at all...this is coming from another source as I see it.

There are numerous folks who do not want to see any changes in NKorea or the South regarding this peace effort. Also China's Xi and Trump are looking for leverage in other disagreements they have....N. Korea is a touch stone for both in China's plays on Taiwan and the Seas.

14 posted on 05/07/2018 6:59:00 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: caww

I don’t disagree with your positions, but a narcissist will burn the world and themselves to get what they “want”.

Have you ever seen a narcissist on a tight leash? Not pleasant........................


15 posted on 05/07/2018 7:05:12 AM PDT by PeterPrinciple (Thinking Caps are no longer being issued but there must be a warehouse full of them somewhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: PeterPrinciple

Yes I understand, even so Kim’s not making the plays....he’s just going through the motions dictated to him. In fact he’s not called it from the get go....the ones holding the money strings for decades dictate his plays......which is why THEY are taking the stand that de-nuclearization must leave the Regime in Place.


16 posted on 05/07/2018 7:25:52 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster; ransomnote; Whenifhow; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; ...

p


17 posted on 05/07/2018 8:16:24 AM PDT by bitt (Back when we had CHILD CONTROL we really didn't need GUN CONTROL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Wow! He is?!? Who’da thunk!


18 posted on 05/07/2018 11:11:16 AM PDT by bgill (CDC site, "We don't know how people are infected with Ebola.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt
***Thae told RFA’s Korean Service that he believes the North will never agree to end its weapons program***

We will see...

19 posted on 05/07/2018 1:41:26 PM PDT by Bob Ireland (The Democrat Party is a criminal enterprise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson