Posted on 05/06/2018 4:36:39 AM PDT by Alas Babylon!
The Talk Shows
May 6th, 2018
Guests to be interviewed today on major television talk shows:
FOX NEWS SUNDAY (Fox Network): Rep. Mac Thornberry, R-Texas; Joseph diGenova, Former U.S. Attorney; Lanny Davis, Former Clinton White House Special Counsel.
MEET THE PRESS (NBC): Michael Avenatti, lawyer for adult film actress Stormy Daniels; Michael McFaul, former U.S. ambassador to Russia and Obama administration advisor.
FACE THE NATION (CBS): Counselor to the President Kellyanne Conway; Avenatti; Kim Arrroch, British's ambassador to the United States; George Washington University constitutional law professor Jonathan Turley; Former CIA and National Security Agency director Michael Hayden.
THIS WEEK (ABC): Rudy Giuliani, President Donald Trump's personal lawyer; Avenatti.
STATE OF THE UNION (CNN): Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif.; Sen. Roy Blunt, R-Mo.
Merriam-Webster Dictionary: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary
treason: the offense of attempting by overt acts to overthrow the government of the state to which the offender owes allegiance or to kill or personally injure the sovereign or the sovereign's family
sedition: : incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority
See post 235.
No, I just threw them in the cooler with a unbagged bag of ice.
I cleaned them when I get home.
But it has been 30 years or so since I fished in the Chesapeake for blues and rockfish (striped bass)!
On this matter, the lawyers for Manafort only care about their client, and their client is getting screwed.
The judge owes him legal relief if he finds Manafort to be a victim here. Certainly the judge could restrict his ruling to just this prosecution of Manafort without getting into the legal bounds on a Special Counsel and the Justice Department?
Yes. But I still don't know what such a ruling would be based on. The SC statutes seem to give the SC a lot of latitude WRT "other matters." What we need is an AG/DAG who is willing to rein in Mueller.
My understanding is that treason is a subset of sedition. There is a foreign component in treason (at the benefit and/or a foreign enemy) whereas sedition is from domestic sources.
In “Blacks Law Dictionary” it says this about treason -” ‘treason’ consists of two elements: adherence to the enemy, and rendering him aid and comfort.” Same source the distinction between “treason” and a “sedition” is that sedition TENDS toward treason but is short of it.
We may be splitting hairs. But the refusal of the United States to prosecute Confederate officers etc. was because the insurrection was not for the benefit of a foreign power so it amounted to “sedition”.
Yeah, I do and I remember where that attempt wound up.
They would have gone after a younger justice it seems to me. He wasn’t in tip top condition
Thanks!
More difficult to convince the public that a younger Justice suffered from heart condition. Every body expects the older ones to keel over sooner.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.