Posted on 05/06/2018 4:36:39 AM PDT by Alas Babylon!
The Talk Shows
May 6th, 2018
Guests to be interviewed today on major television talk shows:
FOX NEWS SUNDAY (Fox Network): Rep. Mac Thornberry, R-Texas; Joseph diGenova, Former U.S. Attorney; Lanny Davis, Former Clinton White House Special Counsel.
MEET THE PRESS (NBC): Michael Avenatti, lawyer for adult film actress Stormy Daniels; Michael McFaul, former U.S. ambassador to Russia and Obama administration advisor.
FACE THE NATION (CBS): Counselor to the President Kellyanne Conway; Avenatti; Kim Arrroch, British's ambassador to the United States; George Washington University constitutional law professor Jonathan Turley; Former CIA and National Security Agency director Michael Hayden.
THIS WEEK (ABC): Rudy Giuliani, President Donald Trump's personal lawyer; Avenatti.
STATE OF THE UNION (CNN): Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif.; Sen. Roy Blunt, R-Mo.
Great pic. Thanks Rod. The soldier on our right needs to learn hoe to salute. Compare him with the soldier on our left.
The Iranians have increased their oil output. Iran is buying the Airbus from the EU.
It is amusing that the current boogeyman, Russia, is a signatory to the Iran deal and has sold one nuclear reactor to Iran with three more in the pipeline. Yet most of the Dems want to stay in the deal. Kerry as a surrogate of Obama is trying to keep the US in the deal meeting with the Iranians and EU leaders among others.
Because RRod realized he “Blanked up” and attempted to get in compliance AFTER the fact.
NOT good enough, we will see.
“This may have been foreseen and give the Donald the ability to replace Jeff S , with Rudy.....”
Doubtful. Rudy’s health isn’t the best and he doesn’t have the stamina for the daily grind to head the DOJ. We love him for his efforts in NYC, he completely turned the city around from a criminal death trap to a functioning, successful metropolis.
After Judge Ellis called out the scope of Mueller’s Russian Collusion Hoax Team, I think this thing is showing the possibility of a massive revelation unexpected.
The Judge is opening up dynamite on both the scope of what the Special Counsel was given to perform and pointing to the continuation of the FBI counter intel investigation using shady and illicit US intel monitoring of the Trump Campaign and into the actual Trump Administration.
Rod Rosenstein is on the knife’s edge now. If he’s approved illicit domestic spying in his warrant approval during the campaign and continued it in the Trump Administration, there’s going to be hell to pay.
It appears Jeff Sessions may have stood back to allow the Deep State to hang themselves.
There’s going to be redemption for some and a whole lot of pain for the rest. It seems we’re on the cusp of all these discoveries which the Trump Administation has known back to when NSA’s Admiral Rogers visited Trump Tower and gave the warning on the massive domestic spying.
Cong. Devin Nunes may be in fact playing his role in pushing to see the “scope” document among others from the Mueller investigation exposed. He said AG Sessions may not even “know” about the subpoena.
That’s how deep the Deep State has dug the hole.
I read a good chunk of the hearing transcript, and I didn't get that sense at all. The sense I got was that the old Manafort case was disjointed from the SC jurisdiction to investigate the Trump campaign. The judge didn't ask how the prosecutor got evidence. He was probing for a connection between Russia or the campaign, and the (pre Trump campaign) Manafort case in EDVA. Those are all subject-matter jurisdiction questions.
I also read the several articles Sundance has put out, and I think he's imagining things. In a bit of slop (separate criticism from his imagining things), his use of "Title-1 / Title-3" jargon is presumptuous, in assuming his readers know the difference. Plus, he is mixing statutory elements, because all the FISA elements (where his is picking up the "Title-1" phrase) are separate from criminal wiretap/surveillance statutes, which carry their own --independent-- Title nomenclature.
Bull$h1t, Adam $h1t!!!
The FBI had PREVIOUSLY looked at Manafort’s dealings—before the Trump Campaign—and decided it wasn’t worth prosecuting. SO, having the closed case file brought back to life was Mueller et Al’s attempt to squeeze the life out of Manafort for testimony against Pres. Trump.
Nobody cared about what Manafort had done/not done UNTIL the Mueller “Get Trump” Special Counsel Witch Hunt, as Judge Ellis duly noted.
For the sake of research only, I did search for her movies and watched them.
Honestly, I could only stand it for a few seconds.
She’s one of those overly dramatic screamers.
She sounds like she’s getting her head slowly pulled off in some Medieval torture device.
So fake!
If I had been Trump and she acted like this in sexy time, I would have stuffed a pillow in her mouth!
We live on the Gulf Coast. (Gulf of Maine)
175 plants!!! WOW...
Rosenstein and Mueller will argue there is no update, only the preparation of a written summary of what was original subject matter jurisdiction to SC.
Your take on potential judge ruling ?
Trump was a playboy so what?
And JFK and horn dog Billy Jeff weren’t.....
Also I guess they forget they were that way “ in office” and with Billy J... literally
I checked your GP link with the Brave, Chrome, Slimjet, and Firefox browsers. Each browser gave the message highlighted by Pat in reply 71 but then went on to the GP homepage.
Let's apply that standard to Bill Clinton's perjury. Oh wait, "it's only about sex, and everybody lies about that."
Talk about lack of credibility. Liberals can't be trusted on anything. Don't turn your back, don't give them power.
Problem is Netanyahu has thousands of backup pages straight from Iranian nuke intel. Its the real deal. The mullahs will have to acknowledge it or just start trouble as they most likely will.
Problem is starting trouble with Bibi and the Donald won’t end well for them....
There’s doing it for money and there’s doing it for pleasure. The good pornstars do both.
When I looked her up and tried some movies I found them unwatchable. She’s a horrible actress, doesn’t enjoy what she’s doing and does ‘Gonzo’ porn which I find distasteful.
The only thing I like about her was her age. That indeterminate age between 38 and 48 where I find well kept women very beautiful. And I don’t have to see porn to figure that out.
Once again i was quoting from a link,,,not my comments....
A local porn shop here in town on one of our busiest streets is advertising Stormy Videos on its BILLBOARD....
Yeah its broke here, using Firefox.
Thanks for reply.
About a week ago, I obtained same results as you - first the message then on to the GP homepage.
But since then, I only get the error message on both Chrome (laptop) and Android (phone).
As noted, MS Edge and Firefox works just fine.
I plan to contact GP to see what they say.
Thanks again for the reply post
Brays writings are inspirational and informative to many of us, and a must read each week.
We learn a lot, and go away with a deeper understanding of history in many regards, patriotism, sacrifice, and the increasingly lost value, of respect for the founders of this country.
Count me, and if I may speak for fellow posters, among those who view him among our best and brightest in these dark days...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.