[kaehurowing]

Nope, the data is contaminated and the results have to be “adjusted out” with a computer model “filter.” The global warming hoax correlates precisely to when the Big Island eruptions began. The Big Island CO2 data became exhibit A to the global warming theory. All the other NOAA readings from other sites are also adjusted to fit the Big Island data.

[palmer]

All the other NOAA readings from other sites are also adjusted to fit the Big Island data.

That's completely ridiculous. Anyone can measure CO2 for as low as $100. They will see a fairly steady rise of about 2-3 ppm per year.

Yes the Mauna Loa is cleaned, but here's the daily (black dots)

The website says "The daily means are based on hours during which CO2 was likely representative of âbackgroundâ conditions, defined as times when the measurement is representative of air at mid-altitudes over the Pacific Ocean."

Other measurement stations have even "dirtier" data since they are closer to respirating vegetation, cities, power plants, etc. But they show the same rise with some southern hemisphere lag, etc.