Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LibWhacker

So it begins....


7 posted on 04/18/2018 3:22:34 AM PDT by Politically Correct (A member of the rabble in good standing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Politically Correct

Definition of an assault weapon includes any semi-automatic weapon that has one or more of the following:

two items from the list:

(iv) a fixed magazine capacity in excess of seven rounds; or

(v) an ability to accept a detachable magazine;

Won’t those blue dog Democrat deer hunters sure be surprised!

BTW - even in MN I can’t imagine this bill going anywhere. Here in Washington state some congresscritter will bring up a bill like this. It gets brought up for consideration and is promptly voted down.


9 posted on 04/18/2018 3:37:59 AM PDT by 21twelve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Politically Correct

It began in 1962. In 1976 they threw off the mask claiming they “only wanted to control handguns” calling for a full ban as their end goal and “Rifles will not be affected!”

In 1987 they threw of the “Rifles” mask and called for bans on semi-auto rifles.
Then in the 1990s, they threw off the mask calling for bans on certain large caliber bolt action rifles.


44 posted on 04/18/2018 6:08:26 AM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson