So some of you think it’s not really happening? Reuter’s and USA Today are wrong? Just want to be clear if it’s Russian origin you dispute or the whole thing.
At this point, yes, there have been so many cries of “Russian wolf!” that I am at the point where I believe no accusation being made against Russia, especially when it comes from the same people who repeatedly lied to us before.
These people are all about getting Trump at any costs, and that means pushing Hillary’s “Russians-stole-my-election” narrative, no matter how dead that horse may be.
I’ll give you the specific detail as to why this particular accusation is not credible.
Note in the article, almost all the quotes - especially the key ones - are from anonymous “officials”.
Of the three people who are actually named, NONE of them make the accusation that the article makes.
So the question is: who are these unnamed US and UK government officials who are making the accusation? I’d wager that they’re all Clintonites or Deep Staters with mischief on their agenda, and this would be obvious if they were named - so they are not named.
Bottom line: to believe this accusation you have to take the word of anonymous government “officials” - the well-known hallmark of fake news.