Posted on 04/16/2018 6:07:17 PM PDT by Kaslin
This!
This is the first account of this that says Cohens attorneys got the ruling in their favor WRT looking at the docs for attorney client material.
You said it. It’s no one’s business other that Sean’s
You said it. It’s no one’s business other that Sean’s, and especially not Juan William’s
Well, I’m shocked!
I didn’t think ANYONE ever got free legal advice.
I’m so naive.
Can't argue with that. I guess they think the Deep State is going to win and don't want to go down with the rest of us when it does.
There enough there for Mueller to get a search warrant now to see if that is true. More than enough.
The linchpin of our whole legal system is the notion that the accused is entitled to a defense; lawyer/client commo is protected for that reason.
If LEO’s can raid a law office willy-nilly clients will gradually stop trusting their lawyers.
Is worth it to throw out our legal system wholesale, in order to GET Trump..?
Apparently they think so.
I doubt if Whiney Juanie has ever disclosed his conversations and dealings with his lawyer ... and I daresay they would be much more “shocking” than any of Sean’s dealings with Cohen. “Let him without sin cast the first stone!”
Kimba Wood? Theres a blast from the past! Wasnt she the judge who BJ Clinton tried to nominate for the Supreme Court early in his first term but had to withdraw her name when it was revealed she was once a Playboy Bunny in one of Hefners clubs? Or was she the other one who had to withdraw when it was discovered she was paying her Hispanic maid under the table with no Social Security taxes being taken out? Old boy really could pick them, huh?
Juan Williams gives affirmative action a bad name./sarc
Hannity often has lawyer Alan Dershowitz on to discuss the legal and ethical issues surrounding Mueller, Comey and the rest of the FBI/DOJ crooks. Dershowitz just took Hannity to the woodshed at the start of tonight’s interview for not revealing that he has/had a consultation relationship with Trump attorney Mark Cohen. Hannity responded it was minor and didn’t involve politics, but property. Dershowitz said just the same it would have been best to have revealed it up front before discussing and supporting Cohen.
Never happen.
If Sean’s interaction with Cohen was minimal, with no retention of Cohen as a lawyer and billing of fees, and I’m not suggesting it wasn’t, why was Hannity listed as a client in the material seized by the FBI?
I think maybe Hannity had a parking ticket or two or may have not used his turn signal and he had to consult with Mr. Cohen regarding these or similar legal matters.
It must be Roy Moore’s revenge!
They are willing to throw-out a lot more than our legal system in order to get Trump.
It didn't leak. Cohen revealed it himself in open court.
Cohen claimed the government had seized "hundreds of thousands" of privileged documents. The Government responded that there couldn't be that many, because most of Cohen's business didn't involve practicing law, and he only had two clients. Cohen said, no, I have three; the judge asked him who the third was, and Cohen answered Hannity.
You are shortchanging car salesmen.
I don’t think anyone considers Hannity a “reporter.” Would anyone be shocked to learn he has a bias? Is that something he has hidden?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.