Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Eleutheria5

Senator Sander’s use of “we” is annoying.

Is he afraid that the use of “I” would not carry sufficient gravitas? Or perhaps expressing his viewpoint as a personal viewpoint would make him too responsible for his words?

In any event, his “we” has no majesty to it, it reminds me more of Gollum from LOTR.

Well, heck! There’s your answer. Bernie has multiple personalities and “we” is his personal, personal pronoun.


27 posted on 04/16/2018 6:43:37 PM PDT by Captain Rhino (Determined effort today forges tomorrow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Captain Rhino

It’s the Ayn Rand “we” from Anthem. Having no sense of self, the protagonist speaks only in the collectivist first person plural, until his epiphany in the last chapter.

Sanders can’t be Gollum. Gollum is addicted to the “precious,” a magic ring. And to Bernie all wealth must be shared, and there is no magic and nothing is sacred.


29 posted on 04/17/2018 12:19:11 AM PDT by Eleutheria5 (“If you are not prepared to use force to defend civilization, then be prepared to accept barbarism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson