Your reductio ad absurdum argument is as ridiculous as your manufactured outrage.
If and when Hannity does a segment on a specific person or entity, it is important for his credibility that he disclose whether or not he has a personal stake in what he’s about to say.
His credibility as measured by the Editorialist’s Code of Ethics? LOL
Talk about reductio ad absurdum.
I love your sincere outrage though. Raiding Trump’s personal attorney’s files? Pht. Demanding the lawyer reveal the names of all of his clients publicly? Meh. An editorialist who does commentary doesn’t tell everyone he had a non-client conversation about real estate with a lawyer? Flay him!
You’re a joke.