Hannity isn’t a reporter, he’s an editorialist and does commentary. In particular he made extensive commentary on April 9th about the raid on Cohen’s office without disclosing to his audience that he was personally involved with Cohen and that details about himself could have, or would have, been included in the materials siezed.
I think that would have actually made his commentary MORE powerful, pointing out that he couldn’t possibly be involved with ‘Muh Russia!’ but that the stampeding of attorney-client privilege had now brought him into the situation.
The fact that he talked extensively about the raid on Cohen’s office without mentioning his involvement with Cohen was a mistake. I calls ‘em like I sees ‘em.
You call having a personal conversation with Cohen "involvement" with him? Why would you think he would have had any reason to think a personal conversation he had would come up in this investigation or in court? You realize that Hannity talks to dozens of people every week looking for information on the numerous stories he covers don't you?
This is the United States not East Germany. Who he talks to is no one's business.