Posted on 04/16/2018 11:19:00 AM PDT by sevinufnine
'I wanted a woman president really badly and I supported Hillary Clinton,' she told ABC's George Stephanopoulos. 'A lot of my friends worked for her. I was devastated when she lost,' she added. The Comey children were also ready for Hillary.
'Oh yeah,' Comey said, asked about his wife's support for Clinton. 'I didn't take a poll among all the kids, but I'm pretty sure that at least my four daughters, probably all five of my kids, wanted Hillary Clinton to be the first woman president.' 'I know my amazing spouse did. My wife and girls marched in the women's march the day after President Trump's inauguration,' he said.
The network flashed a photo of Patrice and the Comey daughters taking part in the march that drew hundreds of thousands of protesters the day after Trump's inauguration. Comey's wife holds an apparently hand-made sign that says 'Stand Up For Women.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
Trump did get the majority of the white women vote.
So there’s that...
:)
Trump Female Voter here!
bump
Well... isn’t that special?
I think it would be better to require a test before getting the right to vote, Civics, logic, basic economics & history.
No matter the contents of the crotch there are fools and fuzzy thinkers. Guam tipping over....that was no lady’s statement. The Founders wanted to give the vote to property owners because they would have a stake and not be voting themselves bread & circuses. They were not wrong.
In total agreement here..........;)
No, she did not.
She wanted a Hard Left president who was incidentally female.
If Margaret Thatcher had been the GOP nominee in 2016, Comey’s wife would have vigorously campaigned against her!
Typical liberal sh##head wife of a typical liberal sh##head criminal
Regrettably, you did not catch on that my hypothetical candidate (non-smoking, non-drinking decorated war veteran who doesn’t chase women and is an animal-loving vegetarian) was not hypothetical.
He was Adolf Hitler. That’s what identity voting can lead to.
Not devastated enough to hang herself.....just bitch about the loss to Trump.
The hell it didn’t.
At the time it was passed, how many women owned property by the sweat of their own brow from participation in the marketplace, as opposed to “the economics of familial persuasion?”
Fast Forward to today...
How many women are dependent, either economically, or for court ordered coercion, on “The State?” If that’s not the modern equivalent of “bread and circuses,” I don’t know what is.
When you can get the majority of voters (women) to believe they should be “respected” for any other reason than virtue, and men to defend women’s despotic privileges, your “circus” certainly isn’t at any loss for “clowns.”
It is both an oversimplification and an error in understanding to blame the 14th amendment and suggests an incomplete knowledge of the amendments related to the right to vote.
Women are not the problem. Uninformed voters who vote for giveaways and pie in the sky unworkable social justice programs are the problem. Uninformed voters come in both genders & all colors.
I suggest you also look into the issue of poll tax: https://constitutioncenter.org/interactive-constitution/amendments/amendment-xxiv
The Fourteenth Amendment (Amendment XIV) to the United States Constitution was adopted on July 9, 1868, as one of the Reconstruction Amendments. The amendment addresses citizenship rights and equal protection of the laws and was proposed in response to issues related to former slaves following the American Civil War.
15th Amendment: Race No Bar to Vote
The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude. Passed by Congress: 2/26/1869
Ratified by states & took effect: 2/3/1870
19th Amendment: Women’s Suffrage
The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any on account of sex. Passed by Congress: 6/4/1919
Ratified & took effect: 8/18/1920
The Twenty-fourth Amendment (Amendment XXIV) of the United States Constitution prohibits both Congress and the states from conditioning the right to vote in federal elections on payment of a poll tax or other types of tax. The amendment was proposed by Congress to the states on August 27, 1962, and was ratified by the states on January 23, 1964.
26th Amendment: Voting Age
The right of citizens of the United States, who are eighteen years of age or older, to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of age. Passed by Congress: 3/23/1971
Ratified & went into effect: 7/1/1971
The future is female, until some powerful men decide it is not.
Women are not the problem. Uninformed voters who vote for giveaways and pie in the sky unworkable social justice programs are the problem. Uninformed voters come in both genders & all colors.
Then you should have no problem demonstrating the validity of your "oversimplification and error" assertion, cause FRiend, I got stacks to demonstrate the validity of mine.
Therefore, I invite to to proceed with the demonstration, rather than tossing around unfalsifiable conclusions. And be further advised: NAWALT is a very fragile platform.
Has anyone asked her if she ever thought her husband would turn out to be a Felon, a crook, and a Liar all in one day??
P.S. Which of the cited amendments gave its previously disenfranchised beneficiaries an AUTOMATIC majority?
What, Obama wasn't feminine enough for you?
I’m sorry. I’m not playing. I don’t agree with dividing people into classes. America’s strength is in it’s understanding that individuals are our Country’s greatest resource.
I’m sorry. I don’t feel the need to please all the people all the time and your frame of reference is alien to me. You must have faced a lot of pain & betrayal in your life to feel as you do. I hope you will find peace.
NAWALT: A word often used by women claiming they are “anti-feminist” in order to gain man’s trust and pressure them into rushing out and getting married, mostly against the man’s will . Frequently used by advocates of unmarried women who complain they can’t find a husband.
If my husband called me his amazing wife I’d fall to the floor laughing. What a girly-man.
Of course you're not. You are satisfied by platitudes rather than facts.
Refusing to face the problem will never provide a solution.
Now you can look up "Bulverism" (as noted in my tagline) as it perfectly typifies your fallacious reasoning.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.