Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HotHunt

The NY’er has a much wider readership than just that leftist sh*thole, thanks to the internet.


42 posted on 04/16/2018 10:11:30 AM PDT by fwdude (History has no 'sides;' you're thinking of geometry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: fwdude
The New Yorker on the internet is not the problem. It's just one magazine directed at intellectually-challenged liberals. Total circulation in 2015 was just over a million copies. Subscriptions go for $70 annually for hardcopy or digital.

This magazine is not read by anyone who is poor or dumb. It's read by liberal elites and wannabes. The magazine not liking Chick-Fil-A because they are Christian will not change any minds about Chick-Fil-A.

The problem in our society, however, is the millions upon millions of people who voluntarily "vomit up" (as Rush Limbaugh described it) all of the personal details of their private lives on to Facebook, Twitter, Snapchat and whatever others there are.

All of these social networks are run by liberals and as evidenced recently with *uckerberg testifying in Congress, they all steal that information, archive it and dispense to the feds, advertisers and whoever else they want to. They censor conservatives and close accounts of the they don't like politically.

It is in this liberal-owned and run social network realm that the Left will mess with the minds of the "intellectually unwary", not The New Yorker magazine.

46 posted on 04/16/2018 10:44:24 AM PDT by HotHunt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson