Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/15/2018 8:42:32 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: sukhoi-30mki

Straight rip off of an f-15.


2 posted on 04/15/2018 9:06:55 PM PDT by Bulwyf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Looks as stealthy as a brick. Is that the best theyve got. The Russians have come up with some beautiful aircraft, this isn’t one of them.


3 posted on 04/15/2018 9:14:44 PM PDT by Husker24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

“MiG-31 can fly in outer-space”

Hog wash.


5 posted on 04/15/2018 9:24:11 PM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Anything traveling at Mach 10 should (in theory) be incapable of radical manuvering without breaking up due to g forces.


7 posted on 04/15/2018 9:36:02 PM PDT by 2CAVTrooper (Democrats... BETRAYING America since 1828.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

The article states that the hypersonic missile flies at Mach 10, and it can carry a nuclear warhead.

Mach 10 is about 7,000 mph. That’s 2 miles per second.

Can a nuclear explosion actually maintain its coherence at that speed?

Every hypersonic weapon I have read about uses kinetic energy, not explosive energy.


8 posted on 04/15/2018 9:53:29 PM PDT by zeestephen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Kh-15 is actually a Mach 5 missile. Hypersonic definition is Mach 5 or better. Nasty little bugger. Current effort probably centered around being a carrier killer. Also useful to scare NATO countries. Will likely require a Patriot missile upgrade. Challenging.


9 posted on 04/15/2018 10:20:53 PM PDT by Revolutionary ("Praise the Lord and Pass the Ammunition!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki
the MiG-25, was also upgraded to get the capability of striking ground targets with free-fall bombs

Well, it has the maneuverability of a B-17, so why not make it a bomber? It's great speed made it a one-shot mission, so slow with external stores makes some sense.

10 posted on 04/15/2018 10:31:55 PM PDT by doorgunner69 (Give me the liberty to take care of my own security..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

The asphalt shingles protecting the upper surface of the engine compartment give it a quaint look.


11 posted on 04/15/2018 10:49:23 PM PDT by Steely Tom ([Seth Rich] == [the Democrat's John Dean])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

The MiG-25’s speed is limited to Mach 2.83 but it could reach a maximum speed of Mach 3.2 or more with the risk of engine damage. Service ceiling: 20,600 m (67,600 ft)


22 posted on 04/16/2018 4:37:21 AM PDT by Garvin (Always remember folks, kill a commie for mommy ~ Semper Fi, Mac!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Russia lies....about everything.


24 posted on 04/16/2018 5:09:08 AM PDT by rrrod (just an old guy with a gun in his pocket)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson