I am guessing the argument is over who launched the chem attack? That the Trump Admin wrongly accused the Assad government of initiating the chem attack?
Why should it matter? The chem weapons factory is destroyed. Whoever would make ad use such weapons won’t be able to do anything now.
The use of chem weapons is an atrocity. The President just removed such future atrocities with a missile attack that did not kill innocents, that was announced ahead of time so that people could clear out of the area, that was therefore humane, and which sent a strong message that the killing of children and the parents of those children by such horrible weapons of mass destruction will not happen again.
No US troops died as a result of the missile attack. No coalition troops died as a result. No Russian troops died as a result. No people on the ground, at least no innocents died as a result. All people on the ground were given a heads up that missiles would be coming.
The result is that a factory that produced horrible weapons of mass destruction, weapons used on innocents, is now is destroyed, Unless my information is completely skewed or outright false, that is the result.
So what is wrong with the result?
Works for me.
I saw posters complaining about what *side* was involved and I figured it didn't matter which side it was. The weapons were destroyed.
I'm with you on that line of thinking.