Posted on 04/14/2018 9:35:15 AM PDT by COUNTrecount
'I have NEVER been there!' Trump's attorney Michael Cohen hits back at claims Robert Mueller 'has evidence he visited Prague in 2016' to meet a Putin ally
Cohen hit back at McClatchy report, saying he was in LA with his son, not Prague
New report claims Special Counsel has evidence of Cohen visit to Prague
Steele dossier claimed he met with a close Putin ally there in late summer 2016
Cohen has vociferously denied the trip and even produced his passport
Michael Cohen, the embattled personal attorney of Donald Trump, has denied fresh reports that Special Counsel Robert Mueller obtained evidence he visited Prague in 2016.
'No matter how many times or ways they write it, I have never been to Prague. I was in LA with my son. Proven!' Cohen wrote in a withering tweet on Saturday.
'Bad reporting, bad information and bad story by same reporter Peter Stone,' he wrote.
Cohen was referring to a McClatchy report on Friday, which cited two sources claiming that Mueller's investigators traced evidence that Cohen entered the Czech Republic through Germany in August or September of 2016.
British ex-spy Christopher Steele's dossier claimed the purpose of the trip was to meet with a prominent ally of Russian President Vladimir Putin, Konstantin Kosachev, but it is not clear whether Mueller has evidence of such a meeting.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
I think what they are saying is he could have flown in and out of Rome, then gone to Prague Shengen-style.
Brad Heath (@bradheath) April 13, 2018
Do I have this right? Trump has proved that his communications with Cohen are not lawyer-client privileged because he stated that he had no communication with Cohen so, viola, guilty?
Brad Heath is a freakin' genius!
Fire Hire is NOT OBSTRUCTION of JUSTICE.
Fire Hire is PROMOTION of JUSTICE.
IMPEACHMENT is OBSTRUCTION of JUSTICE.
There was such a person. Same name, same birth year, passport from another country, different birth date.
Didn’t Jake Tapper cover this FAKE NEWS in 2016, during the election cycle. I believe it was another man with same name, who went to Praque! Easy enough to contact Tapper show and find out, I guess.
Here is some info on it:
http://dailycaller.com/2017/01/11/govt-source-confirms-trumps-lawyer-was-not-in-prague/
I take this statement to mean that Mueller's fellow travelers in the State Dept, CIA, or FBI have manufactured "evidence" of a Cohen visit to Prague. I put nothing beyond these people.
So basically Mueller has nothing, despite the gestapo seizure of Cohens belongings.
As Obama was, Trump is a huge moneymaker for both sides. People are so stupid.
"Has it occurred to anyone that if Russia really wanted to screw with the American political system, that they would now start planting false evidence for Mueller to find showing collusion between Trump and Russia? It would guarantee impeachment, tying us up for a year or so. They would also be able to get back at Trump for the actions he has taken that have not been in Russias interest."
" Just a thought."
I've long been concerned about just this danger. The supposed concern the deep state had that Russia may have compromising intel on Trump has morphed into giving Russia real leverage because of our own government's actions.
They arent leaks because they are transparent fiction /s
YOU ARE CORRECT!
Good cop, bad cop: Sessions and Trump
https://garygindler.wordpress.com/2018/04/11/good-cop-bad-cop-sessions-and-trump/
It was not a private jet - sheesh! it was the same SR-71 G.H. Bush took ... you gotta keep up!
I cannot prove I was not in New Delhi in Aug. 2016, but I have never been there.
—
We have a photo of you tossing money to a beggar in the New Delhi slums on Aug. 2016 ... a copy is on its way to Mueller.
And slice at the neck line
You mean to say there are ~two~ Michael Cohen’s in the world?
Cohen needs to calm down. Mueller is needling him, trying to get him worked up and upset. That’s when mistakes happen.
Ah but it is all ok, because the fact that he got nothing proves that Cohen wasnt really very much of Trumps attorney and so the fact that we violated privilege to find nothing means we didnt violate the privilege because it didnt exist because we say so.
As I remember Cap Weinberger was indicted for withholding evidence he had already submitted.
These people have no shame
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.