To: Wallace T.
They are a naval power now, with the second (or third, behind Japan) best navy in the world. They sail in all regions at will.
When I sailed in the 80s we were taught to respect, if not fear them.
Their sub force alone gives them that status.
42 posted on
04/13/2018 8:27:30 PM PDT by
Mariner
(War Criminal #18)
To: Mariner
The 80's were a long time ago...
To: Mariner
From looking around, the Russians had 2 Kilo diesel subs and a frigate in Tarsus.
One Kilo and the frigate and some support ships left port.
That against a half dozen Arleigh Burke’s and an unknown number of US/Brit/French subs.
To: Mariner
"They are a naval power now, with the second (or third, behind Japan) best navy in the world. They sail in all regions at will. When I sailed in the 80s we were taught to respect, if not fear them. Their sub force alone gives them that status."
I think they have a few fine naval Kalibr cruise missiles. Not sure what condition the fleet is in though. I don't think Russian forces in Syria can go toe to toe with a reinforced carrier battle group and our land based air assets.
To: Mariner
When you were in the Navy we were facing the Soviet power that Brezhnev built. The Soviets, taking a page from Hitler, chose to focus on submarine warfare rather than take on the American and British fleets. Brezhnev wanted to build a blue water navy, as Kaiser Wilhelm did 60 years earlier.
To: Mariner
Are you for real. The Russian navy can barely put a credible force at sea much less challenge the USN.
134 posted on
04/13/2018 11:28:31 PM PDT by
Destroyer Sailor
(Revenge is a dish best served cold.)
To: Mariner
As long as they’ve got some tugs to assist with mechanical failures.
136 posted on
04/13/2018 11:33:23 PM PDT by
Natufian
(t)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson