Syria is perplexing. On this consrvative site most people are against us getting involved, and on the liberal sites I frequent, the attitude is the same.
So, who, exactly, is the constituency our FedGov is representing when they insist on staying involved?
Or is this just a matter of strategic thinking, and making sure that Russia does not become the main mover/shaker in the region. i.e. is this really about a subtle cold war with Russia, and Syria is just the current battleground?
They are good points you make and the same ones I’m wondering about.
The Military Industrial Complex needs to be nourished on a regular basis and neocons are more than happy to feed the beast.
Hmm... think long and hard, look at the bigger picture, and you may find the answer.
“So, who, exactly, is the constituency our FedGov is representing when they insist on staying involved?”
The DEEP STATE is the only entity that thinks exchanging nukes with Russia is a good idea regarding Syria.
Sickening.