Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Eleutheria5

If anything, they wanted to test how effective the gas was in eliminating a large segment of the population without the damage done by bombs. Besides, chemical warheads on missiles would be an effective attack on Israeli cities.


19 posted on 04/12/2018 6:16:52 PM PDT by jonrick46 (Trump continues to have all the right enemies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: jonrick46

Given the level of technology and fabrication skill shown in the bomb I suspect any “missile” built by the same people would have a range of about 1 mile, and land pretty much anywhere in a 1 mile circle from the launch point.


32 posted on 04/12/2018 7:06:56 PM PDT by freeandfreezing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: jonrick46
chemical warheads on missiles would be an effective attack on Israeli cities.

You would get a nuke in response.

35 posted on 04/12/2018 7:17:36 PM PDT by xone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: jonrick46
If anything, they wanted to test how effective the gas was in eliminating a large segment of the population without the damage done by bombs. Besides, chemical warheads on missiles would be an effective attack on Israeli cities.

It has long been US doctrine that ANY chemical attack on US forces, let alone mass-casualty chemical attack on US cities, would be responded to with nuclear weapons against the attacker.

I suspect Israel's doctrine is the same. I suspect Iran knows this.

62 posted on 04/13/2018 5:14:35 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (Big governent is attractive to those who think that THEY will be in control of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson