” the company’s failure to protect user’s personal data, the social media monopoly.”
Facebook is not a monopoly.
A candidate is not required to advertise on Facebook.
That candidate has alternative avenues for advertising.
People, that would be the voters, have the option to not use Facebook.
It’s getting pretty close.
“If a company has a market share of greater than 75 percent, they will probably be considered a monopoly.”
https://business-law.freeadvice.com/business-law/trade_regulation/monopoly_power.htm
“In January 2018, Facebook had a social network market share of 70.88 percent. Furthermore, it had the greatest market share of social networks that month.”
https://www.statista.com/statistics/280301/market-share-held-by-facebook-in-the-united-kingdom-uk/
There is absolutely ***nothing** ( no matter how expensive the advertising) for keeping in contact with clients and building a following that is as effective as Facebook. Nothing!
If facebook helps organize political pogroms
in the virtual to be extended in the real, they should be thrown RICO charges
Fact is Zuckerberg knows his site is choke full of campaign related money laundering and he is seeking protection from the left by letting them doing their thing while he collects the washed drug money