Posted on 04/12/2018 9:08:31 AM PDT by MNDude
Goldman Sachs analysts attempted to address a touchy subject for biotech companies, especially those involved in the pioneering "gene therapy" treatment: cures could be bad for business in the long run.
"Is curing patients a sustainable business model?" analysts ask in an April 10 report entitled "The Genome Revolution."
"The potential to deliver 'one shot cures' is one of the most attractive aspects of gene therapy, genetically-engineered cell therapy and gene editing. However, such treatments offer a very different outlook with regard to recurring revenue versus chronic therapies," analyst Salveen Richter wrote in the note to clients Tuesday. "While this proposition carries tremendous value for patients and society, it could represent a challenge for genome medicine developers looking for sustained cash flow."
(Excerpt) Read more at cnbc.com ...
Any one who actually studies the Q posts will quickly realize that he is an insider with deep knowledge.
But he also mixes in disinformation on purpose which confuses people.
At what point does the cost of a cure pass the break even point. The cheaper the cure the higher the profit.
What needs to be understood to appreciate whats going here is the fact the Q is basically creating a circular flow diagram that can be referenced and cross-checked with news releases. Q cant just disclose specifics about a situation or operation without violating security protocol. Instead they drop questions and statements that lead to answers that can be understood once the subject becomes public. This provides the validation necessary for the public to believe The Great Awakening is legit. Disinformation and misdirection with Q is real. In other words Q is pointing over there but really the focus is here and only until you publicly get the news can you go back and understand. (Think SA drops) All of this is accomplished without giving up specific details about the operation. Its quite genius.
Apr 9 2018 19:33:59 (EST) Q !xowAT4Z3VQ ID: 0cd760 974537
>>974444
Is that a trick question?
Perhaps it is time to ask if the gamblers on Wall Street are good for the viability of the nation? There was a time when the stock market provided resources to build industries, however, it is largely a casino now with the stock hustlers playing the house odds.
Big Pharma does not want a cure for diabetes. They want people to keep buying drugs for life. Same with heart disease and statins, which are dangerous and completely unnecessary.
Preventing a disease like cancer is nowhere as profitable as selling drugs and procedures as treatments.
As long as our borders are open, and liberal politics treasonous, it’s a great business to be in.
Liberals continually dream up diseases so pharma has a solid future.
Realize that tax dollars funds a lot of the research that these pharmaceutical companies benefit from.
So they get to privatize the profits and socialize the expenses.
Much the same model of our university’s. Socialize research and privatize the patents.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.