Posted on 04/12/2018 4:08:24 AM PDT by Kaslin
This may be an idea that nearly violates the laws of physics, but here goes: As everyone assembles horserace stories and betting lines for Paul Ryan’s successor, how about hitting a seven-month pause button?
I know how crazy this sounds. Every manual for seeking office suggests a crisp, early start. That would mean every candidate looking to run for Speaker of the House should start positioning right now, while attention to the vacancy remains high. But as Ryan announced his retirement intention Tuesday, one thought rushed to the foreground as I evaluated the big names likely to announce, and maybe even some potential surprises. It occurred to me: shouldn’t we see if a Republican Speaker’s race is even going to happen?
This is not driven by pessimism. As loud choruses sing of a Blue Wave that will hand the House of Representatives back to Democrats, I remain deeply skeptical. Of course the left is mightily torqued off and ready to derail the Trump agenda; but I foresee as autumn unfolds a surge of realization among Republicans that losing the house in November means articles of impeachment in January. That obstacle to every item on the Trump agenda should mobilize every conservative voter to show up to mitigate the pushback that usually accompanies the midterms following a presidential win.
But in a year where anything is possible, the smartest Republican strategy involves focusing on that main goal: keeping the majority. A busy, tense, distracting Speaker’s race is not helpful toward that end.
An instant scrum balkanizes the party at a time when it should show as much unity as possible. The various wings of the party still exist: supporters and critics of Trump, conservatives and moderates along the fiscal and social scales, hawks and isolationists on the world stage. But one phrase should obliterate all of those differences: “Speaker Nancy Pelosi.”
So the key question: Can every aspirant to the Speakership restrain the flow of competitive juices for the relative eternity of just over half a year? Just writing that sentence, the answer comes back: probably not. The path to victory involves heavy courtship of the full scope of the GOP membership, and it’s a tough sell to ask everyone to hold back until the morning of November 7.
But there are upsides. A communal agreement to delay the Speaker’s race would reveal a focus and pragmatism attractive to voters. It is easy to see a sharp-elbowed fight dimming voter enthusiasm as questions over priorities would properly arise. The hopefuls might be asked which means more, the team victory that keeps the majority, or their quest for a title?
Waiting until November also allows the aspirants to know whom they are dealing with. Imagine the frustration of spending extensive face time this summer with an incumbent who gets voted out; imagine the positive optics of letting the voters decide who will be schmoozed between November and January.
The positives are many, but the scales may still tip toward a race that is in full bloom before we even get out of April. If the main storyline is to feature a battle royal between Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy and Whip Steve Scalise, both camps are probably itching to start the roundup. And if they are to be joined by others, such as Rules Committee Chairman Pete Sessions or Republican Conference Chair Cathy McMorris Rodgers, an alternative campaign has a special compulsion to crank up early.
But if it is at all possible, there is great benefit in a display of patience and big-picture wisdom. If every candidate to succeed Paul Ryan can help propel the boat for a while, there is a greater likelihood of the captain’s chair staying available. They would be free to wink and nudge and feign suspended interest in the big office, and they would surely be wrangling support behind the scenes. But even the mere appearance of message discipline could be of substantial value to the party and to their individual prospects for the Speakership.
Not going to happen for a couple of reasons. One, there are people on both sides of the aisle who want to be Speaker. Republicans are in for a possibly contentious contest. Democrats will, reluctantly, stick with Pelosi because they can’t be seen as working to replace a woman as speaker. Two, a lame-duck Speaker has no pull, no influence. Members won’t follow him out of party loyalty and donors won’t give the big bucks because he can’t offer anything in return. So the Republicans need someone that they can point to, and run on, as the Speaker of the future if they retain the House. I don’t see Ryan staying in the Speakers office past the early summer.
Steve Scalise…NOW
Establishment mumbo jumbo.
R.P.
Here’s reality, the race to follow Ryan has been in full swing since he was elected.
Ryan was a compromise choice, a worthless go along get along big gub mint puke.
NOT one worthless agency eliminated?
No wall.
Still obammycare.
Huge growth in gub mint spending?
Great job there Mr. Speaker, no go home and hunt with your kids. Play in the woods pal.
Whose turn is it?
If the House GOP had their $hit together and wanted to win in November, they would have a new Speaker, who backs the President, in place by Monday.
Which means: "The Prussians do not shoot that fast either."
McCarthy.
Better not be-—we don’t need more of the same!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.