Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BluegrassCardinal
Despite this, some here are itching for a war with Russia, not unlike the neocons like Bolton, Sen Graham and that that half dead jackass from Arizona, McLame. I even read a post from someone that stated a tactical nuke release wouldn’t be so bad.

If you think they'll just use nukes on the IC sites and sub pens, I have beachfront property to sell you in Cumberland, MD! I'm near DC, and that place will DEFINITELY be in the crosshairs if we go nuclear.

73 posted on 04/11/2018 6:25:21 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (The US Constitution ....... Invented by geniuses and God .... Administered by morons ......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

In a counterforce strike, the Russians would attempt to hit the land based missiles, our subs, bomber fields etc. Would they hit DC in the first salvo? If they are trying to decapitate the leadership and destroy our command and control, then yeah DC would get nailed, as would our FEMA continuity of government shelters that the Russians are well aware of I’m sure.

My point is, once you get a tactical exchange going, how do you stop it from being escalated into a regional or international strategic exchange? You don’t. Anyone arguing that a tactical release is not a bad idea is one of these war hungry neocons that think a nuclear war is somehow survivable


151 posted on 04/12/2018 12:01:52 PM PDT by BluegrassCardinal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson