Posted on 04/10/2018 2:00:32 PM PDT by Jim W N
See link
https://www.facebook.com/TheDailySignalNews/videos/1043586805807271/UzpfSTIxMzc1MzI0NDgwOjEwMTU2MjUwMzE0NTM0NDgx/?sk=h_chr
Zucker is the enemy, not the ally. That’s the difference.
I do like your citations which have nothing to do with this libturd called suckerberg.
That's the point isn't it? Did you even read the passage from Man for All Seasons?
How are the Obama's of this world able to run roughshod over our constitutionally-protected individuals rights? Because the Right has suspended those rights for the guys we think are the bad guys like Zuckerberg.
If the Right can ignore the Constitution against their opposition (like Zuckerberg), why can't the Left do that to their opposition (us)? Answer: They CAN, they HAVE, and they WILL and they won't stop until they have taken away all of your freedoms and all of your money.
I don’t defend leftist libturds, ever. Never will I make deals with the devil. You don’t seem to differentiate the left from the moderate conservative. Moderate conservatism is a hallmark of free republic and most of the followers. Suckerberg is a flaming, sneaking, underhanded liberal that has used a public utility to sell personal information of its members. Millions of people have been taken in by this conartist.
Please acknowledge my point. We all know that Zuckerberg is a Suckerberg, but you’re willingness to suspend the Rule of Law against those you hate allows the Left to establish the tyranny of the Rule of Man.
As I said, today Zuckergberg, tomorrow, you, and they won’t have to explain themselves.
I am not acknowledging that since Zuck is the one that has broken the law. Read what I wrote. Furthermore he has hidden money off shore to avoid paying what he owes in taxes. He has also used a public utility in an unlawful manner without compensating those he sells information without their knowledge, to the highest bidder—this is a violation and an invasion of privacy. Many people have also used such information to commit crimes.
What law?
a public utility
Facebook is not a government entity, it is a private enterprise.
Most public utilities ARE private companies-—but Facebook is not a public utility.
.
Don’t tell me - I know that. Tell that to Neoliberalnot who calls FB a “public utility”.
Facebook is a private enterprise. The feds have no constitutional authority over FB or Zuck.
I thought most utilities, as well as Facebook, are public companies.
“I thought most utilities, as well as Facebook, are public companies.”
—
Nope——most are private companies——my gas provider is National Grid,which is a British company.
The telephone companies(Verizon) are not public companies either.
Facebook is NOT a public utility.
.
I don’t know about your gas provider, but the other companies mentioned in your post are public companies, i.e. shares publicly traded on the stock market.
I know they are traded on the stock market———but they are owned by the shareholders not the government,which is what I thought that you meant-——my apologies.
.
No biggie or apologies needed. I was just making a minor clarification.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.