Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump-appointed US attorney recused from Michael Cohen investigation
ABC News ^ | 10 April 2018 | Jonathan Karl Josh Margolin

Posted on 04/10/2018 12:55:04 PM PDT by zeestephen

Geoffrey Berman, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, is recused from the Michael Cohen investigation...The recusal was approved by senior Justice Department officials who report to Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein...The raid of Cohen's office was handled by others in the office of the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York and approved by a federal judge.

(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Geoffrey Berman is a Trump appointee with ties to Rudy Giuliani who donated money to the 2016 Trump campaign.
1 posted on 04/10/2018 12:55:04 PM PDT by zeestephen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: zeestephen

There can only be Trump-haterz on the team.


2 posted on 04/10/2018 12:57:10 PM PDT by Mr. K (No consequence of repealing Obamacare is worse than Obamacare itself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zeestephen

So how did this go down? I’ve heard conflicting reports. One was that Berman reviewed the request and declined to act and got a call from Rosenstein telling him to recuse himself and the other is that when he saw it involved the President’s lawyer he recused himself? Anyone know?


3 posted on 04/10/2018 12:58:27 PM PDT by pgkdan (The Silent Majority STILL Stands With TRUMP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pgkdan

From the language used in the article I’d give it a 90% chance that it was not voluntary. Reads like the author is deliberately evading the revelation of involuntary recusal. Note the lack of “recused himself” anywhere.


4 posted on 04/10/2018 1:00:55 PM PDT by thoughtomator (Number of arrested coup conspirators to date: 0)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: zeestephen

Related...

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3646393/posts


5 posted on 04/10/2018 1:02:54 PM PDT by ButThreeLeftsDo (MAGA/KAG!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pgkdan
So how did this go down? I’ve heard conflicting reports. One was that Berman reviewed the request and declined to act and got a call from Rosenstein telling him to recuse himself and the other is that when he saw it involved the President’s lawyer he recused himself? Anyone know?

I don't have an answer. But that was my first impression when I read about this earlier. Berman felt what was being done is unethical and declined to participate.
6 posted on 04/10/2018 1:02:55 PM PDT by JoSixChip (He is Batman!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: zeestephen

But Mueller’s witch hunt team is made up of NOTHING BUT Hillary bootlickers and Dem donors and no one gets recused.

OK, I think I’ve got the picture.


7 posted on 04/10/2018 1:03:39 PM PDT by Signalman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pgkdan

Karl is DC based so I assume this is a leak/spin from Mueller/Rosenstein.


8 posted on 04/10/2018 1:04:18 PM PDT by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: zeestephen
So, when Clinton's lawyers are involved, they get immunity deals; Trump's lawyers are either recused or served with search warrants.

Doesn't seem like an even playing field to me.

9 posted on 04/10/2018 1:06:45 PM PDT by Repealthe17thAmendment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pgkdan
So how did this go down? I’ve heard conflicting reports. One was that Berman reviewed the request and declined to act and got a call from Rosenstein telling him to recuse himself and the other is that when he saw it involved the President’s lawyer he recused himself? Anyone know?

In either scenario, Rosenstein is a threat, either direct or implied.

10 posted on 04/10/2018 1:12:24 PM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

Apparently.


11 posted on 04/10/2018 1:17:26 PM PDT by Eagles6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: zeestephen
Why did he recuse himself?

If he's unwilling or unable to do his job supervising the Southern District, then fire him.

And that worthless sack of dung Sessions.

The President is lost if he cannot assert authority over the Department of "Just Us."

12 posted on 04/10/2018 1:26:18 PM PDT by pierrem15 ("Massacrez-les, car le seigneur connait les siens")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ButThreeLeftsDo
Thanks.

I goofed - I think the same story has been posted here three times.

I almost always do a F.R. search before I post, but the time stamp on the ABC article was only 15 minutes old when I stumbled across it.

I was thinking: “Huge Story!” “Huge Story!” “I'm the first Freeper to see it!”

Whoops!

13 posted on 04/10/2018 1:27:48 PM PDT by zeestephen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote; Whenifhow; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; 2ndDivisionVet; ...

P


14 posted on 04/10/2018 3:56:15 PM PDT by bitt (We do not need the electric chair - we need electric bleachers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson