Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Air Showdown: America's F-22 & F-35 Stealth Fighters vs. Russia's S-400 (Who Wins?)
The National Interest ^ | April 9th, 2018 | Dave Majumdar

Posted on 04/09/2018 12:49:58 PM PDT by Mariner

Russian air defenses may appear formidable as part of Moscow’s increasingly sophisticated anti-access/area denial (A2/AD) capability, but areas protected by these systems are far from impenetrable bubbles or 'Iron Domes’ as some analysts have called them.

While it is true that a layered and integrated air defense may effectively render large swaths of airspace too costly—in terms of men and materiel—to attack using conventional fourth generation warplanes such as the Boeing F/A-18E/F Super Hornet or Lockheed Martin F-16 Fighting Falcon, these systems have an Achilles’ Heel. Russian air defenses will still struggle to effectively engage fifth-generation stealth aircraft such as the Lockheed Martin F-22 Raptor or F-35 Joint Strike Fighter.

“In terms of establishing viable air defenses against opponents with fifth generation aircraft, it's quite clear how Russia is trying to tackle the problem of stealth," said Mike Kofman, a research scientist specializing in Russian military affairs at CNA Corporation during an interview with The National Interest. “Russia's advanced radar, variety of capable missiles and systems that try to integrate large amounts of data for a more potent air defense will increasingly segregate Western air forces into two benches. In a future where these systems have proliferated to China, Iran and other regional powers there will be those that can penetrate and survive against advanced air defenses in a high end fight, and those whose job it is to bomb ISIL or its successor.”

(Excerpt) Read more at nationalinterest.org ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: aerospace; aviation; f22; f35; s400
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: Mariner

It looked ;like an even contest until the Russian upped the anti with the arrival of their SU-35S. After that the No-Fly zone pertained to US planes.

Just remember kiddies, the S-200, S-300, an S-400 and likely the S-500, where it in theater, are linkable. What one sees, they all see; best missile and best target lock used.

And of course do not forget that the Russian excel at jamming - something the US lags badly on. So all those sensor may not work as advertised in actual combat. This being especially true if the Russians succeed in keeping the AWAC (or whatever it is now) so far away as to be useless to the 22s and 35s.


21 posted on 04/09/2018 2:15:41 PM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
IS TOO!!
22 posted on 04/09/2018 2:22:32 PM PDT by Darteaus94025 (Can't have a Liberal without a Lie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PIF

Did you read that off the marketing brochure the Ruskies gave to the Syrians?


23 posted on 04/09/2018 2:26:47 PM PDT by Darteaus94025 (Can't have a Liberal without a Lie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: PIF
"...best missile and best target lock used."

That target lock thing works both ways.


24 posted on 04/09/2018 3:09:57 PM PDT by PLMerite ("They say that we were Cold Warriors. Yes, and a bloody good show, too." - Robert Conquest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino; Mariner
...radars are merely a function of processing power and speed which doubles every 18 months.

A stealth airframe vs increases in SAM technology? The airframe fixed in time is bound to lose in a few short years. Even Ben Rich admitted this.

When that time comes, we will wish we had way more F-15s instead of the slowest least maneuverable fighter we have deployed since the early 60s.

You expressed my concern perfectly, DesertRhino. I also believe the next war might be fought largely without GPS. Excellent thread, Mariner.

25 posted on 04/09/2018 3:20:38 PM PDT by Always A Marine ("I am going to instruct my attorney general to get a special prosecutor to look into your situation")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: PLMerite

The batteries have lots of antimissile missiles for just such an occasion. they are formidable systems and not to be taken lightly. Witness the shooting down of Israeli missiles (rockets/guided bombs, whatever) over Syria in the T4 attacks by relatively lowly S-200 antiques.


26 posted on 04/09/2018 3:29:53 PM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
seems to me Israeli F-15s already won that fight...
27 posted on 04/09/2018 3:30:30 PM PDT by Chode (You have all of the resources you are going to have. Abandon your illusions and plan accordingly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

Very interesting with the addition of actual stats for comparison.


28 posted on 04/09/2018 3:34:24 PM PDT by Neoliberalnot (MSM is our greatest threat. Disney, Comcast, Google Hollywood, NYTimes, WaPo, CNN, NBC, CBS, ABC ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Always A Marine; DesertRhino

“A stealth airframe vs increases in SAM technology? “

Gents, respectfully...

The idea that we should sacrifice the very advanced features of the F-35 in order to be able to fight a 1960 era air war, to me, seems counter-productive. And it’s a view shared nearly universally by everyone who had the opportunity to buy them.

Remember, their physical performance is still limited by a software load. Mach 1.6 and 9G is not a dog.

These aircraft will always have an advantage in modern air warfare...for the life of the platform. Even IF the Russians figure out how to target them.

The pilots situational awareness and ability to target/deploy weapons will continue to be superior...and the advantage of stealth will never be completely eliminated.


29 posted on 04/09/2018 3:51:36 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Precisely. The F-35 is today’s F-111 Kitchen Sink.


30 posted on 04/09/2018 3:52:19 PM PDT by YogicCowboy ("I am not entirely on anyone's side, because no one is entirely on mine." - J. R. R. Tolkien)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: halfright

Agreed! F-22 is today’s F-15.


31 posted on 04/09/2018 3:53:29 PM PDT by YogicCowboy ("I am not entirely on anyone's side, because no one is entirely on mine." - J. R. R. Tolkien)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: PIF

Did the Syrians actually shoot down the Israeli missiles? I haven’t seen any proof as of yet.


32 posted on 04/09/2018 7:03:23 PM PDT by BBell (calm down and eat your sandwiches)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

The weak link in missile AA systems is... missiles. If you can goad sites into expending their load outs on a variety of $200-$20,000 RC aircraft the rest of it will be easy because you can always release payloads outside of the range of conventional cannon AA, and onto them to make the area accessible to ground support aircraft.

The final arbiter of AA is going to end up being kinetic or energy based systems that can reach out to missile ranges without costing 5 million dollars every time you pull the trigger.


33 posted on 04/09/2018 9:14:58 PM PDT by Axenolith (Government blows, and that which governs least, blows least...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

Interesting article.


34 posted on 04/10/2018 11:58:11 AM PDT by redgolum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson