I can think of one huge one in 1993. You may not think it was that big a deal, but the only difference between it and the one in 2001 was that the latter case was a success.
I can think of one huge one in 1993. You may not think it was that big a deal, but the only difference between it and the one in 2001 was that the latter case was a success.
Let's ponder this:
Considering the disasterous "deep state" history of ball-dropping, with their involvement (or prior knowledge, and subsequent lack of intervention) in Ruby Ridge, Waco, all the school shootings, the Boston organized crime scandal, the Boston Marathon Bombers scandal, Ft Hood, and a myriad of other known likely murderers, coupled with the "progressive" (deep state) court rulings attempting to shut down the influx of parties from known terrorist states, and the obvious recent corrupt partisan (deep state) behavior trying to throw the election, and having failed that, to remove Trump from office....(breathe)
From 30,000 feet, looking back at 9/11 and some of the "truther" whacko conspiracy-theorist arguments...since Bush didn't actually "own" the deep state any more than Trump does....
Why isn't it possible that the hyper-partisan FBI/CIA etc didn't also have a hand in looking the other way, or otherwise assisting Mohammed Atta and his merry band of murdering terrorists, allowing 9/11 to happen for the intended purpose of getting rid of GWB?
They're WAY less than not pure.