>
>>
[[the Court reasoned that because the possession of a sawed-off double barrel shotgun does not have a reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well-regulated militia,]]
>>
The court is wrong=- the 2n’d A makes no mention of a militia- it simply states that the rights of the people to defend themselves/bear arms shall not be infringed-
>
Come now, Bob, the 2nd DOES indeed mention militia, but it is subordinate to the last 1/2 of the text; merely reaffirms the militia IS The People.
>
Judges have legislated from the bench concerning this issue- and should be removed or their opinions/decisions overturned
>
Concur, but I have no hope any critter in D.C. has the fortitude, let alone will.
Govt has become a round-robin of ‘wink wink nudge nudge’, scratch your back you scratch mine.
Anyone truly believe they would upset THAT apple cart??
[[Come now, Bob, the 2nd DOES indeed mention militia,]]
You’re right, i spaced out on my statement-
[[but it is subordinate to the last 1/2 of the text; merely reaffirms the militia IS The People.]]
it does make mention of ‘well regulated’ however- but the second amendment does not grant people inalienable rights- all people are given the right to defend themselves by God- not by order-