[dirtboy]

I do not agree with Scalia on this, and I am vehemently opposed to any kind of AR-15 ban at any level. Elsewhere in Heller, Scalia states that some level of regulation is still allowed. My point is, Heller is not an airtight protection of 2nd Amendment rights the way some think it is. We have to remain vigilant.

[Clean_Sweep]

Again you are refusing to accept what was decided. Nobody cares what you believe.

He writes what was protected and what was not. PROTECTED FIREARMS “COMMONLY IN USE”.
RESTRICTED “UNUSUAL AND DANGEROUS”.