Piers tried to mansplain to the kid. And flopped.
Read about this the other day. The young man could have also pointed out to Morgan about how the United Kingdom at one time had very casual firearms control laws (police permits were not required for the legal purchase of shotguns until 1967, for example) accompanied by even lower violent crime rates. After stricter laws were enacted following the mass murders in Hungerford in 1987 and Dunblane in 1996, violent crime got even worse and even now stands well above the way it was in the years before 1967.
Thanks for posting...
Piers Morgan=Progressive Dolt=Useful Idiot...
Young Mr. Kashuv=Patriot...And a well-spoken, well-informed one at that...Here’s to a bright future with young people like Kyle coming up...
Mr. Morgan...Please feel free to butt out of US public affairs any time, and soon, please...We already got rid of British tyranny once, don’t push it here any more...
Bookmarking
Easy to see why the Hogg boy ran for the hills when Kyle challenged him to debate.
It does not matter. Uniparty already preselected the ignorant out of 3000 students and have already passed more gun bans. They jam it through emotionally.
INCREMENTAL GUN BANS mean YOU lose!
Republicans LOSE. When was the last time a Republican sunset or repealed an incremental gun ban??
.
Pee-ers is a real head case.
Absolute freedom hater. He probably admires the Redondo Beach community organizer.
.
Piers Morgan has a fetish for being unarmed.
He shows up that way for every battle of wits.
This kid is a stud, with a bright future if he keeps his head on his shoulders.
Ben Shapiro did this to this stupid Limey git a couple of years ago and made so much of fool him Morgan was shoved off to cover sports. And now he’s getting schooled again? Man. This guy is too stupid to be an idiot.
From the article:
“...The Federalist Papers (published 1788) stated that the purpose of the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution was to guarantee the right of individuals — not just the “militia” — to bear arms in self-defense. ...”
After Morgan said no individual right to bear arms in the 2nd amendment, Kashuv responded:
“...Kashuv fired back: “That’s completely and totally not true. You should try and read Federalist 46. Also, see SCOTUS ruling in Caetano and Heller.”
In the landmark 2008 Supreme Court case District of Columbia v. Heller, SCOTUS ruled that the Second Amendment protects an individual’s right to possess firearms unrelated to whether they serve in the military.
And in the 2016 federal lawsuit Caetano v. Massachusetts, the U.S. Supreme Court again unanimously held that the plaintiff, an individual, had the right to carry firearms in self-defense. “
Good job, Kashuv !